↓ Archives ↓

Launch of the Conservative Candidate Network

 

Inline image 1
 
A Conservative believes in personal responsibility, limited government, free markets, individual liberty, traditional American values and a strong national defense. The role of government should be to provide people the freedom necessary to pursue their own goals. Conservative policies generally emphasize empowerment of the individual to solve problems.
We believe our Declaration of Independence and Constitution are the framework for our Republic.
 
2018 is the Year!
From Carrie Miller
Once more good Conservative people who are sick and tired of our “ILL fated” state being decimated need to take action. OR……  Will the names U-Haul, Bekins, Allied, United, Mayflower and 2 Men and a Truck be more important to you!
Many of us have spent years working to save our state and country from the ravages of the “Left wing” insanity.  It’s distressing to see so little improvement or change as a result of much of our labor and we are rightfully tired and burned out.  Over time we have found that our worst enemy on the road to getting good Conservatives in office who truly believe in Conservative values is the Republican establishment.
For years WE have worked on their campaigns, acquiring petition signatures, gone door to door and made thousands of phone calls.  In return, they do not support our preferred candidates. Money donated on behalf of our preferred candidates may never reach them. Help from the establishment is mostly nonexistent. They treat Conservatives as their real enemy instead of Democrats!
We have been informed the Illinois Republican “Establishment” is shying away from any association with President Trump and suggesting potential candidates do the same during the 2018 cycle.  Of course, the “establishment Republicans” will deny this when asked…but just look at Governor Rauner who still refuses to work on behalf of our REPUBLICAN President!  TRUMP SUPPORTERS…..your time is here….step up and join us.
Therefore, CCN the Conservative Candidate Network Committee has been created to help recruit and elect legitimate Conservatives to office and ensure the constituents that their money and support will be going directly to the candidate of their choice, not wasted on whomever the Republican Party wants to support by building a “Champion Team” .
The good news is that this plan will not require a huge time commitment. We need to establish ourselves as a force to be reckoned with against both failed Parties in this state for the 2018 election cycle which is gearing up now.
Here’s how it will work:
1.We are establishing a network of county coordinators who will assist in recruiting and  “vet” candidates who wish to run for state, federal, or county offices. These candidates will fill out a Conservative Candidate Survey (template already established), and after meeting with the candidate in person to review his/her views, gives the candidate the “stamp of approval” … or not.
2. Preferred candidates from across the state are then added to the Conservative Candidate Network website with appropriate contact information, donation information (which will go directly to that campaign and not in a general fund)
3. People will then have a much better idea of whom they wish to support financially and physically by working directly with the campaign.
This is what we call “Conservatives finally taking control”
There are no “go between handlers”. The money goes directly to the candidate and the vetting insures we are putting our money, time and effort in the “RIGHT” places
What can you do?  Join the CCN Champion TEAM – (people who are willing to work hard and put “boots on the ground” to “ring them bells”) to get the Conservative Candidate elected.
 
·         Volunteer to become a County Coordinator. There are 102 counties and we already have over half the state covered!!!
·         Encourage good people to run for office as well as precinct committeeman and have them contact us on the Conservative Candidate Network website.
·         We will need volunteers in other capacities.  Every volunteer is a very important part of the TEAM effort.  Don’t hesitate to make contact.
·         For more information or to get involved go to the website or respond to this email by contacting one of the emails below:
Email  –  ccnetwork18@gmail.com,
Facebook  –  htts://www/facebook.com,
This can be a game changer!
Now is the crucial time to take action!
Join us today!
MORE SUGGESTIONS FOR MAKING OUR VOICES HEARD!
Enough is Enough
Tired of all the reported news that has never been substantiated with facts?  Let your voices be heard from the “flyover country”.
                        New York Times                                    Washington Post
                        620 8th Avenue                                      1301 K Street NW
                        New York New York    10018                  Washington, DC  20071
Let’s Get Congress Moving on the Issues  –  contact your Senator/Representative and tell them to act on President Trump’s Agenda……we want to see some action now!
Peter Roskam                           202-225-4561     630-232-0006
Mike Bost                                 202-225-5661     618-457-5787
Rodney Davis                           202-225-2371     217-403-4690
Randy Hultgren                         202-225-2976     630-584-2734
John Shimkus                           202-225-5271     217-347-7947
Adam Kinzinger                         202-225-3635     815-431-9271
Darin LaHood                           202-225-6201     309-671-7027
Call Governor Rauner and suggest he VETO the following bills  –  217-782-0244
                        HB 40               Funded Abortions
                        HB 1785            Change of sex on birth certificates
                        SB0031             Illinois Trust Act seeks to protect and build trust between law enforcement agencies and immigrant communities by limiting local police involvement in federal immigration enforcement.
                        HB 9                 Bargain Budget  –  NO to TAX increases!
                        SB 1381            Eliminating Telephone Landlines
                        HB 2691            Eliminating Telephone Landline
What do you think the Conservative definition of Resist would be?
REASON ENERGIZE STRENGTH INFORM SUPPORT TEAMWORK

Source: Will County News

Trump News June 21, 2017

Obamacare has led to higher costs and fewer health insurance options for millions of Americans. The 2010 healthcare law has brought the American people rising premiums, unaffordable deductibles, fewer insurance choices, and higher taxes. President Donald J. Trump promised to repeal and replace this disaster, and that is exactly what he is working with Congress to achieve.

TODAY’S EVENTS

9:45 AM: Vice President Pence delivers remarks at the U.S. Department of Justice National Summit on Crime Reduction and Public Safety

11:30 AM: Vice President Pence participates in a call with Turkish Cypriot leader Mustafa Akinci

11:30 AM: President Trump receives a cybersecurity briefing

6:10 PM: President Trump tours Kirkwood Community College

6:25 PM: President Trump gives remarks at an event highlighting agricultural innovation

PHOTO OF THE DAY

Vice President Mike Pence and President Petro Poroshenko of Ukraine | June 20, 2017 (Official White House Photo by Joyce N. Boghosian)

OBAMACARE FACT OF THE DAY

FACT: Next year, 94 out of 99 Iowa counties may only have one insurer selling Obamacare coverage and no choices.

WHITE HOUSE UPDATES

Yesterday, President Trump met with President Petro Poroshenko of Ukraine.

Yesterday, Vice President Pence delivered remarks at the National Association of Manufacturers 2017 Manufacturing Summit.

Secretary of Labor Alexander Acosta spoke at the SelectUSA Investment Summit where he detailed the Trump Administration’s plans to expand and invest in apprenticeships.

ICYMI: First Lady Melania Trump welcomed students from the U.S. Department of Education Presidential Scholars Program to the White House earlier this week.

Yesterday, Mrs. Karen Pence spoke at the Congressional Award Gold Medal Celebration for Military Youth.

The application period for the Fall 2017 White House Internship Program closes this Friday, June 23. Interested applicants can apply here.

WHAT WE ARE READING

“Regardless, in places and among people who have felt abandoned politically, dismissed culturally, and forgotten economically, hope has been in short supply. And for now at least, as Todd Sias put it, “The hope of [the American dream] is alive again with Donald Trump.”Daniel Allott in the Washington Examiner

President Trump will travel to Iowa on Wednesday to highlight the need for Internet connectivity in rural areas and to promote the administration’s technology agenda…” The Hill

China opened its gates to US beef imports this week, giving American cattle farmers much sought-after access to the country’s massive market following a 14-year ban….Announced last month, the lifting of the beef embargo was one of the first concrete results of trade discussions that began when Chinese President Xi Jinping met with Donald Trump…” Agence France Presse

Source: Will County News

Independent investigators: Seth Rich likely killed by ‘hired killer’ or ‘serial murderer’

Independent investigators: Seth Rich likely killed by ‘hired killer’ or ‘serial murderer’

92 Shares

Key Findings of the Profiling Project Report:

  • Seth’s death does not appear to be a random homicide.
  • Seth’s death does not appear to be a robbery gone bad.
  • Seth[‘s] death was more likely committed by a hired killer or serial murderer.
  • There may be additional video surveillance of the crime and crime scene.
  • The resolution of prosecuting the individual(s) responsible appears to be hindered both actively and passively.
  • Seth’s killer(s) most likely remains free with the community.

An independent, nonpartisan and all-volunteer group of forensic experts and George Washington University graduate students investigating the murder of DNC staffer Seth Rich just punched some major holes in the official story of the young man’s untimely demise.

The group, working under the moniker The Profiling Project, released the results of its investigation of the Rich murder on Tuesday.

In its report, the group outlines how it used standard investigative practices accepted by the nations biggest law enforcement agencies and whatever information it was able to ascertain to produce a thorough profile of the victim and investigate possible motives for his homicide.

From the report: “The goal of PP was to create as strong a profile of Seth Rich as possible. That profile would then be compared to the various profiles of the theories surrounding Seth’s death. PP understood that the bulk of our information would be second and third-hand accounts, reporting’s and statements. To assess validity of such information, PP established a weighted tool to give value to the credibility, reliability and validity of the statements and information reviewed. We conducted statement validity assessments for any statements or information we were presented.”

Based on what the group learned about Rich’s personal history and lifestyle, the group determined that the former DNC staffer had a “low-to-moderate” risk of victimization.

Included under the “Victim Risk Assessment” section of the report, PP includes this statement about Rich’s Facebook profile: “Reportedly, in his last Facebook posting prior being shot, Seth posted ‘I have family and friends on both sides of the law’ which may indicate an understanding of the criminal system.”

The group noted that Rich’s murder is one of the few recent non African-American homicides to occur in the area, raising the possibility that he was the victim of a racially motivated attack. But the care taken to avoid leaving evidence behind at the crime scene, PP contends, doesn’t support the theory.

The investigative team’s analysis of the crime scene, including the location and care taken to leave no evidence behind, provides some of the most intriguing background on the cold case provided to date.

From the report:

With an unknown offender and very limited crime-scene information, a through profile of the offender is not possible. However, based on the following assumptions, we find the following:

If the CCTV cameras PP observed on May 4, 2017 around the crime are consistent with the CCTV cameras on July 10, 2016, the offender could successfully remain unrecorded in approaching, engaging and withdrawing from the crime-scene.

Offender brought a most likely unregistered firearm to the crime-scene, utilized the firearm and most likely carried the firearm away from the crime-scene with them post-commission. This is a bold behavior in D.C., which has some of the strictest gun laws in the country.

The act of killing is one of the most extreme human behaviors. The offender had already accepted that the use of a firearm was an option, indicating that offender had either previously killed, or a significant amount of preparation had gone into planning for this kill. Additionally, offender could elude police from the commission of the crime to present.

That the crime-scene appeared to be almost sanitized (no firearms casings were reported to be found, no physical evidence was reported) and that there does not appear to be excessive use of force (as only two shots were reported), the offender does not appear to be psychotic. Offender did not display excessive emotion at the crime scene, did not appear to act from hate, anger, fear, gain, jealousy or revenge, all motivations for murder.

The group determined that the most likely perpetrator profile is that of a serial killer.

But it’s examination of the evidence it gathered also leaves room for some stomach-turning questions. For instance, the group discounted the likelihood of scenarios involving a possible contract killing carried out by a professional assassin only because investigators have not yet released toxicology reports that could indicate whether a poison was released into Rich’s body.

A professional murderer, PP contends, would not have left the scene with Rich still alive and, according to reports, still conscious and able to speak with first responders.

A theory PP describes a potentially valid is that the crime scene was initially ignored by arriving officers because: “The full-scope of Seth’s injuries were not recognized initially as life-threatening.”

“As such, Seth was not urgently transported to a hospital and the crime scene was not given the attention that a murder crime scene would receive,” the group continued.

Barring the release of information pertaining to Rich’s official cause of death and a full toxicology screening– there’s no way to know for sure that the two gun shot wounds to his back were what actually killed the staffer.

Mainstream media and the political establishment has declared that any questions about motives behind the Rich killing that veer from the official botched robbery explanation are wild conspiracy theories. And the denigration continued Tuesday, with MSM focusing less on the details of the PP’s report than on the fact that the group is funded in part by GOP lobbyist Jack Burkman.

Despite his success in D.C., MSM outlets have lampooned Burkman as a wild-eyed conspiracy theorist… part of that vast, right-wing group that’s been hounding the Clintons for years.

But as we endure a national nightmare centered on investigating high ranking politicians for all manner of insane alleged crimes ahead of the 2016 election, what’s one more. Wikileaks founder Julian Assange has already suggested that Rich had something to do with the massive leak that harmed Clinton’s campaign. And Assange’s cryptic assertion is no less shaky than the handfuls of leaks and unnamed sources that sparked the Russia/Trump/obstruction circus.

That’s not to say Hillary Clinton is responsible for Rich’s murder, nor that she was involved in any of the other strange deaths over the years some Americans can’t help but wonder about. For more on that, check out “Act Three” of this episode of This American Life from way back in 1997.

But at a time when MSM is content to examine every single possible angle of the Trump ordeal, isn’t it even worth considering the possibility that a powerful person could be capable of terrible things, in addition to connected enough to be assured they’d never be caught?

Here are a few important dates to remember: 

September 2015: The Russia hacked the DNC meme begins after an FBI special agent contacts DNC headquarters to report that its databases had been compromised.

March 17, 2016: Then top Trump endorser Jeff Sessions says: “I think an argument can be made there is no reason for the U.S. and Russia to be at this loggerheads. Somehow, someway we ought to be able to break that logjam. Strategically it’s not justified for either country.”

In the following months, Trump would advocate renewed relations with Russia in the interest of targeting international terror while rebuking the Clinton doctrine that would put the U.S. at odds with the nation by hammering down on Syria (seen the news lately?). He would also praise Russian leader Vladimir Putin’s leadership on more than one occasion.

April 2016: DNC IT officials notice more suspicious activity on computer networks.

May 2016: Clinton-connected IT firm ClowdStrike declares that the DNC intrusions are the work of highly sophisticated Russian hackers.

June 15, 2016:  A mysterious online persona going by the name “Guccifer 2.0” begins releasing  DNC documents online and claiming responsibility for the attack. CrowdStrike repudiates the claims, still blaming Russia. The hacker would subsequently release donor reports (June 18), a damning dossier on Clinton (June 21).

June 22-June 30, 2016– “Guccifer 2.0” begins giving backstory. Says: “I can only tell you that I was born in Eastern Europe. I won’t answer where I am now.”

Also, the hacker mocks the blame Russia story from Clinton and the DNC: “It seems the guys from CrowdStrike and the DNC would say I’m a Russian bear even if I were a catholic nun in fact. At first I was annoyed and disappointed. But now I realize they have nothing else to say. There’s no other way to justify their incompetence and failure. It’s much easier for them to accuse powerful foreign special services.

“They just fucked up! They can prove nothing! All I hear is blah-blah-blah, unfounded theories and somebody’s estimates.”

July 5, 2016: Comey gives press conference on the Clinton email “matter” after being coached by Attorney General Loretta Lynch to minimize it’s importance.

July 6, 2016: More damning DNC documents surface thanks to “Guccifer 2.0.” They include DNC’s plan for a counter convention during the RNC. “Guccifer 2.o” also notes: “This pack was announced two days ago but I had to keep you waiting for some security reasons. I suffered two attacks on my wp account.”

July 10, 2016: Seth Rich is murdered.

July 14, 2016: A new batch of DNC documents is released on the “Guccifer 2.0” website– but this time the information is about donors during way back in 2007 and Democratic opposition research on Sarah Palin.

The Guccifer 2.0 leaks continued to roll out in the months following– but the main trove of documents were released by WikiLeaks, as promised on the Guccifer 2.0 website with the initial round of releases: “The main part of the papers, thousands of files and mails, I gave to Wikileaks. They will publish them soon.”

The point here is that whether Clinton was elected or not, an effort to accuse Russia of attempting to undermine U.S. democracy was in the cards as early as 2015.

There were scattered reports that “Guccifer 2.0” named a person known as “Seth” as the leaker and others that that Rich may have been in the process of making contacts within the FBI to come clean at the time of his murder. The reports are unverified, mere conspiracy theories.

But is it really more believable that a billionaire sold out the American people to Russia as he ran for president than that a woman who’s spent her entire life seeking political power would have one lowly staffer murdered to keep him from becoming a squeaky wheel in the press– or worse, the key to dismantling the entire Russia hacking story before it got teeth.

Trump’s gamble, from cushy life as a billionaire to President Russian Stooge, certainly seems like an exercise in diminishing returns. Killing a staffer to protect a budding meme that would be used to ensure that Clinton’s backers got their foreign policy wishes even if the voting public gave her a cold shoulder really doesn’t.

But, hey, there aren’t any powerful media interests or folks at the FBI, CIA, NSA, and various other alphabet soup bureaucracies that would withhold information from the American public to protect a clandestine agenda. Right?

Source: Will County News

Republican Handel wins Georgia special House election

Republican Handel wins Georgia special House election

Republican Karen Handel on Tuesday night defeated rival Jon Ossoff in Georgia’s record-spending, special-election congressional race, keeping yet another House seat in GOP hands and denying Democrats a chance to deliver a rebuke to President Trump.

With all precincts reporting, Handel, a former Georgia secretary of state, led Ossoff 52 percent to 48 percent — a margin of nearly 11,000 votes out of more than 250,000 ballots cast.

The race smashed fundraising records for a House contest — with both campaigns and outside groups combining to spend a record $50 million.

Ossoff’s defeat was another setback for Democrats hoping to capitalize on Trump’s low approval ratings to win a long-standing Republican seat.

It was the party’s fourth straight defeat this year in attempts to win a Republican seat and take the momentum into the 2018 midterms. They now must win 24 GOP House seats to retake control of the chamber next year.

“This race was going to require all hands on deck, and that’s what we had,” Handel said at her victory party. “Tonight’s victory is for you. It’s for every citizen in the 6th (Congressional) District.”

To be sure, the contest was close since Handel and Ossoff were the top finishers in April’s first balloting, which sent them to Tuesday’s runoff.

Ossoff lead by nearly 5 percentage points as recently as June 12, before the race deadlocked in the final days, according to the RealClearPolitics.com polls average.

The 30-year-old Ossoff, whose campaign was hurt by revelations that he didn’t live in the suburban Atlanta district, thanked his campaign team and voters in a short concession speech.

“Thank you for the most extraordinary process that I have ever been a part of,” Ossoff said. “The fight goes on. Hope is still alive.”

The House seat has been occupied by Republicans since 1979. GOP Rep. Tom Price gave up the seat in February to become Health and Human Services secretary.

President Trump didn’t campaign in Georgia for Handel. But he attacked Ossoff on Twitter for living outside the district and warned voters that he would increase taxes and be soft on national security.

Handel supporters chanted “Trump, Trump, Trump” at her victory party. And the president tweeted his own message of congratulations.

House Speaker Paul Ryan, R-Wis., also congratulated Handel, saying, “Karen is all business. I’ve campaigned with her, and I know how eager she is to get to work. I’m excited to have her as a partner in the House.”

Ossoff tried to thread the needle in the conservative-leaning Georgia district by vowing to cut taxes for small businesses, while championing equal rights for women and minorities, which earned him the support of civil rights icon and Georgia Democratic Rep. John Lewis.

Handel touted her experience as a state and local elected official and argued that outside forces were trying to buy a win.

Voters “are not interested in Hollywood and California coming in and buying this seat,” she said Tuesday morning on Fox News’ “Fox & Friends.”

In terms of individual donations, Ossoff vastly outpaced Handel, with nearly $24 million to her $4.5 million. An Atlanta Journal-Constitution analysis showed just 3.5 percent of Ossoff’s donations between the end of March and May came from Georgia.

Still, Handel also benefited from outside spending, though most didn’t go directly to her campaign.

Groups like the Congressional Leadership Fund, a political action committee backed by Ryan, have spent millions on her behalf.

Also on Tuesday, Republicans held onto the House seat in South Carolina that was vacated in February by Mick Mulvaney so he could become the White House budget director. Millionaire developer Ralph Norman, the Republican, defeated former Goldman Sachs tax adviser Archie Parnell, the Democrat, in a closer-than-expected contest.

The other two special-election races this year in which Democrats failed to win a GOP House seat were in Kansas and Montana.

In Kansas, Republicans held onto the seat of Mike Pompeo, now the CIA director, and they kept the Montana seat of Ryan Zinke, who became Trump’s secretary of Interior.

Democrats have one last outside chance to win a GOP House seat, Rep. Jason Chaffetz’s in a conservative Utah. The special election is on August 15. Democrats won one special House election this year, holding onto the California seat vacated by Xavier Becerra.

While Republicans have held the Georgia seat since former House Speaker Newt Gingrich took it from Democrats nearly four decades ago, the district does not appear as conservative as in years past.

Trump won the district over Democrat Hillary Clinton last year by just 1.5 percent, compared to 2008 when Republican presidential nominee Arizona Sen. John McCain won by 18.9 percent.

The race attracted national attention and record money, but Georgia voters also took a big interest in the outcome.

More than 40,000 people voted early, including 36,000 who didn’t vote in the April contest.

The Associated Press contributed to this report.

Source: Will County News

Gov. Rauner urges lawmakers to pass GOP ‘compromise’ budget plan; Democrats scoff

Gov. Rauner urges lawmakers to pass GOP ‘compromise’ budget plan; Democrats scoff

  • By Dan McCaleb, Greg Bishop and Cole Lauterbach | Illinois News Network

ILLINOIS NEWS NETWORK

Almost two full years into a budget impasse that has Illinois’ debt soaring and its bond rating plummeting, Gov. Bruce Rauner is calling on state lawmakers to approve his preferred budget plan during a 10-day special session that begins at noon Wednesday.

In a public address less than 24 hours before the extra session opens, Rauner said he would sign into law the plan introduced by House and Senate Republicans just last week that would require more than $5 billion in tax increases to pay for spending capped at $36 billion.

“Last week, we reviewed a compromise budget plan that I can sign – that we can all support,” Rauner said. “It moves us to middle ground on key issues. It is truly balanced. It funds schools, higher education, and human services. It provides a real path to property tax reduction.”

Rauner also said the Republican package contains the kind of spending cuts and reforms he wanted.

“The plan also stands tall for fundamentals. Spending reductions. Limits on expenses. Debt reduction. And term limits on legislative leaders and statewide officeholders, including the governor,” he said. “If we can agree to pass it, this plan will send a message across our state and around the nation that we are serious about making Illinois a more attractive destination for investment, new businesses, and new jobs.”

Getting the Republican measure passed through the Democrat-controlled General Assembly will be near impossible, given Democrats’ response. To pass a measure during the special session, a two-thirds majority is required. Democrats have comfortable majorities in both chambers.

State Rep. Greg Harris, in the officials Democratic response to Rauner’s address, called the impasse “Rauner’s budget crisis.”

“Democrats are returning to Springfield in hopes that the governor is finally ready to compromise on a budget,” Harris said, indicating his party wasn’t going to vote to approve the Republican plan as is. Harris also criticized Rauner for calling for unity on a budget deal at the same time he’s funding campaign ads targeting House Democrats.

Powerful House Speaker Michael Madigan also has moved to block Rauner’s initiatives at most every turn. And Senate President John Cullerton has said his chamber already did its job when it passed spending and tax increase packages last month with no Republican support.

The House adjourned without calling any of the Senate’s budget bills to the floor for a vote. Cullerton said it’s up to the House to take up the Senate’s already-approved legislation.

The Republican package revealed last week includes many elements of the Senate Democrats’ plan but with some changes.

For example, the Senate Democrat plan would permanently raise the state income tax by 32 percent, from 3.75 percent to 4.95 percent. Under the new GOP plan, the increase would expire after four years. The four-year expiration date would coincide with a four-year property tax freeze that also is in the GOP plan. The income tax hike also would not be retroactive to Jan. 1, as the Democrat plan is, but would go into effect beginning July 1.

A family with annual income of $60,000 would pay the state an additional $720 a year under the GOP income tax hike proposal, with their tax bills spiking from $2,250 to $2,970.

The property tax freeze includes an exemption on local governments with existing debt service payments as requested by Senate Democrats, but also would allow residents to lower or increase their taxes through voter referendum. Both plans also include an expansion of the state’s sales tax to certain services, and an increase in Illinois’ corporate tax on businesses.

The GOP’s new proposal includes a hard spending cap of $36 billion over the next four years. The spending plan passed by Senate Democrats after bipartisan grand bargain negotiations broke down last month looked to spend $37.3 billion in fiscal year 2018.

State Rep. Jeanne Ives, R-Wheaton, opposes the tax increases contained in both the Senate Democrats and the GOP plans.

“I think Illinoisans are actually ready for an austerity budget or what I would call a budget that spends only what we’re going to to take in,” Ives said. “I want a budget too. I only want to spend what we are projected to take in.”

Ives also said the reforms don’t go near far enough to improve the state’s economy and jobs climate.

“Not only do I not support the tax increase part of the compromise plan, I don’t support some of the reforms in what they call the compromise plan because they’re not significant enough to make the types of transformational changes we need in the state of Illinois,” she said. “We’ve had such little growth and this compromise plan does not bring back the business climate we need to grow the tax pie to be able to afford what people want.”

Illinois’ budget impasse will reach the two-year mark on June 30. Despite that, the state has been spending money at record deficit levels because of court orders and consent decrees. Illinois has a backlog of unpaid bills topping $15 billion and unfunded pension obligations of more than $130 billion. Credit ratings agencies threatened to downgrade Illinois’ bond rating to junk status without a budget deal.

Retired University of Illinois Springfield political professor Kent Redfield said he thinks the special session could go either way.

“This could all blow up, but you’ve got enough change in the dynamic that, at a minimum, the House Democrats are going to have to respond to what the governor has proposed,” Redfield said. “They may run something that is not acceptable to the governor, but we’re more into the dynamic that gets us to the end game.”

Sen. Melinda Bush, D-Grayslake, called Rauner’s address absurd.

“Governor Rauner has made it clear that he has no interest in unifying legislators and passing a balanced budget,” Bush said. “If he did, he would be talking to leaders and legislators from both parties instead of giving phony speeches and spending millions of dollars on political ads attacking the very people he claims to want to unify.”

The fiscal year ends June 30. Rauner said lawmakers need to act by then.

“Failure to act is not an option,” he said.

Source: Will County News

Doing the elite’s bidding

Doing the elite’s bidding

387 Shares

It started with attacks on Tea Party members at rallies. There followed occupations of state houses, takeovers of college campuses and buildings. It morphed into assaults on Donald Trump supporters, Black Lives Matter, the blocking of highways, bridges and airport terminals. It sparked the rise of the fascist group antifa (which, ironically, is anti-fascist abbreviated) and morphed into attackers like the Portland train knife attacker and then the mass shooting at a GOP congressional baseball practice. The violent left is rising again.

It’s not a surprising turn of events. The progressive left has long held a violent streak; from the communists in Russia and China, to Hitler’s National Socialist party (Nazi), to the Weather Underground, to the Symbionese Liberation Army, to union thugs intimidating, assaulting and killing those who cross picket lines, to the Occupy Wall Street movement.

Violence of this nature does the elite’s bidding. It divides the people. It keeps them distracted. Politicians know that if the people ever united against them their jig would be up.

Violence allows the politicians to pontificate on the violence and portray themselves as compassionate, understanding and protective.

At the same time, it grants politicians cover to further denigrate one side or the other, reinforcing the false right/left paradigm of the establishment.

The left is being ginned up by the ongoing fake news that Donald Trump colluded with Russia… that he’s an illegitimate president because of it… that he’s ushering in a fascist regime. Democrat politicians call Trump and his supporters racists and white nationalists and fascists – all the while encouraging violence and encouraging fascist tactics be employed to “resist.”

Former Attorney General Loretta Lynch called on progressives to march, bleed and die in the streets and resist the Trump agenda. 2016 vice president candidate Tim Kaine said the left needs “fight in the streets.”

As the violent rhetoric continues, political resistance becomes violent resistance which becomes armed resistance.

At a rally Sunday, Senator Bernie Sanders called Trump “perhaps the worst and most dangerous president in the history of our country.” On Wednesday a Bernie campaign volunteer with a Facebook page full of posts, comments and memes supportive of Sanders and opposing Trump, Rep. Steve Scalise and other Republicans, opened fire on a group of GOP congressmen — including Scalise.

The elite use violence, confusion and chaos to their advantage. Throughout history, government operatives have covertly and overtly sown violence and used patsies and weak-minded, easily-influenced “useful idiots” to create chaos. It makes the people clamor for more laws and surrender their liberties. It covers the collapsing system.

Source: Will County News

Robert E. Lee, revolution and the question of historical memory

Robert E. Lee, revolution and the question of historical memory

339 Shares

Robert E. Lee
This article was originally published on The Abbeville Blog on June 5, 2017.

Two weeks ago, New Orleans removed its Robert E. Lee Monument, one of four that the city decided to take down. As well, Charlottesville, Virginia, currently finds itself in the midst of a rancorous debate over its Lee statue. All over the South and the nation, moves are afoot to take down monuments, remove flags, hide any symbols that in any way honor or remind the present generation favorably of the Confederacy and the “lost cause.”

There has been much written about what the removals mean. How should we see these attempts to radically erase, uproot and alter portions of our history?

It goes without saying that each generation interprets the past — its past — to enhance, justify and confirm its view of itself. Certainly, the politically correct, cultural Marxist Left, which spearheads the effort to “cleanse” our society of Confederate symbolism, has erected its own set of symbols, totems and myths to legitimize its present activities and its extreme revolutionary zeal. Thus, in the place of Lee, Jefferson Davis and Stonewall Jackson, we witness the rising cults of Nat Turner, Harriet Jacobs, “the Secret Six” abolitionists and the rehabilitation and virtual canonization of the bloodthirsty fanatic, John “Pottawatomie” Brown. In the America of 2017, we have a whole new set of martyrs and saints, whose message is carefully massaged and congealed and then presented as models for us and for our children. And there can be no dissent from this new imposed vision.

The historical profession, almost to a man has joined in, with the likes of Stalinist historian Eric Foner, now heralded as the nation’s “leading historian on slavery and the War.” Everything revolves around slavery and racism as the sole causes of the War and an almost unexpungeable stain that each generation must strive to overcome. Put very simply, it was historic white oppression that had to be defeated and destroyed as part of the advancing historical process, a process that is posited as inevitable and irreversible. It is represented as the latest conquest of the “Idea of Progress.” And that campaign, that ideological narrative for the Left, continues with the present efforts to banish symbols honoring anything to do with the Confederacy and its leaders, even if morally irreproachable individuals like Robert E. Lee are included in the cross hairs.

Hollywood, once 60 years ago eager to honor the heroes and paladins of the Lost Cause, now paints anything Confederate as inherently evil, perhaps rivaling the Nazis in unredeemable brutality. How many times in recent months have we heard crudely educated college students from vaunted Ivy League schools, weaned on Hollywood “blockbusters” like “Abraham Lincoln: Vampire Hunter” and indoctrinated by cultural Marxist professors, parrot such slogans? Is their foul-mouthed sloganeering any different, really, from the high class academic sloganeering of Foner and others of his ilk?

What distinguishes the cultural Marxist historians’ narrative from earlier views is not just its social omnipresence, but its rigid dogmatism that brooks no disagreement, no opposing views. Certainly, 60 or 70 years ago there were superb historians who looked at the War Between the States differently. We only have to mention a few: Charles Sydnor, Francis Butler Simkins, William A. Dunning, Avery Craven, Charles Ramsdell and so on. Today they still are read, but only to illustrate how an earlier generation of historians “misread” history or, worse, attempted to cover up the “sin of slavery” and “white oppression.” Even arguably the greatest recent historian of the South, the late Eugene Genovese, comes in for his share of opprobrium and disdain from the culturally Marxist-dominated historical establishment for his profound and sympathetic probing of the thinking of antebellum Southern whites (e.g., The Mind of the Master Class).

But even back then, even if we suggest that many writers treated the South and the Confederacy with a degree of understanding, even sympathy, there did not exist the kind of extreme scholarly totalitarianism that we find in the academy and in publishing today. A Charles Beard could frame the American Founding in strongly economic terms, while others disagreed in scholarly tomes. The conflict of 1861-1865 was seen as both “repressible” and “irrepressible” (to use the title of a study by Arthur Cole, the term used first by William Seward). But there was no rigid “historical iron curtain” that dictated how historians thought and what they wrote.

And that difference distinguishes the earlier age from our own: For we are victims of a fanatical ideological zeal that increasingly knows few limits. Emerging out of this fanaticism is a type of religious commitment and conviction that dispenses with any opposing narrative as “fascist” or “racist” or “homophobic” and discards any inconvenient fact as “meaningless,” if standing in the way of the inevitable political and cultural objectives. Nothing must stand in the way of progress.

In fact, that onrushing “progress” has no end, no finality and cannot really end, for it is the revolutionary process, itself, that becomes the meaning and actual lived goal for its adherents. Theirs is a Revolution that, like a mortal illness, must continue and ceaselessly unwind, increasingly more unhinged and more unsubtle, as it goes along. But the objective of that Perfect Society where all racism, sexism, homophobia and misogyny are banished, where complete equality of status and income are obtained, where the “chains of established religion” and traditions are broken, that apocalyptic paradise on earth will not be and cannot be achieved.

Every Revolutionary movement, every “ism,” posits a final, perfected society. Whether early pre-Reformation zealots like the Cathares or Lollards, various millenarian sects, the Illuminati followers of Adam Weishaupt, or the socialists, anarchists and Communists of more recent times, a future utopian vision is held up as the final goal, the final stage in mankind’s torturous path to earthly happiness and perfection. But that chimerical objective is always an illusion, and usually a bloody one, strewn with the corpses of thousands, even millions of victims, who stood in the way of its realization.

And with that latest revolutionary impulse comes the destruction of traditions, beliefs and customs that have given society its actual foundation, its memory, those age-tested and handed-down ways of life that anneal and clothe society and protect it from decay and disintegration.

It is no exaggeration to see the attacks on the Lee statues and Southern symbols as part and parcel of this current assault, which aims not just at those more prominent artifacts of the Confederacy, but also takes aim at the very presence of Western and Christian civilization, itself. For, in fact, none of it can stand if the cultural Marxist narrative of irreversible and onrushing Progress, as they understand it, succeeds. It all must go, be removed, taken down, revised, re-interpreted.

The present campaign to remove Confederate symbols, then, should be viewed in this light. And it must be stoutly opposed with that full understanding.

— Boyd Cathey

Boyd D. Cathey holds a doctorate in European history from the Catholic University of Navarra, Pamplona, Spain, where he was a Richard Weaver Fellow, and an MA in intellectual history from the University of Virginia (as a Jefferson Fellow). He was assistant to conservative author and philosopher the late Russell Kirk. In more recent years he served as State Registrar of the North Carolina Division of Archives and History. He has published in French, Spanish, and English, on historical subjects as well as classical music and opera. He is active in the Sons of Confederate Veterans and various historical, archival, and genealogical organizations.

Source: Will County News

Trump News June 20, 2017

President Donald J. Trump is embracing big change, bold thinking, and outsider perspectives to transform government and make it work better, and at a far less cost. This new spirit of innovation will make life better for all Americans by modernizing critical IT systems, making government more transparent, and saving the taxpayers up to $1 trillion dollars over the next 10 years.

TODAY’S EVENTS

10:30 AM: Vice President Pence participates in a bilateral meeting with President Petro Poroshenko of Ukraine

11:00 AM: President Trump meets with National Security Advisor H.R. McMaster with a drop-in by Vice President Mike Pence and President Petro Poroshenko of Ukraine

11:45 AM: Vice President Pence delivers remarks at the National Association of Manufacturers (NAM) 2017 Manufacturing Summit

12:30 PM: President Trump has a Legislative Affairs lunch

12:45 PM: Vice President Pence participates in the Senate Republican Policy Lunch

2:00 PM: Vice President Pence participates in a series of meetings with lawmakers

7:00 PM: President Trump and First Lady Melania Trump have dinner with Vice President Pence and Mrs. Karen Pence

PHOTO OF THE DAY

American Technology Council Working Session | June 19, 2017 (Official White House Photo by Stephanie K. Chasez)

WHITE HOUSE UPDATES

Yesterday, President Trump held a roundtable with the American Technology Council as part of the administration’s sweeping transformation of the federal government’s outdated technology services.

Yesterday, President Trump and First Lady Melania Trump welcomed President Juan Carlos Varela and Mrs. Varela of Panama to the White House.

Secretary of Agriculture Sonny Perdue hosted a trilateral meeting with Canadian Agriculture Minister Lawrence MacAulay and Mexican Secretary of Agriculture José Calzada Rovirosa in Savannah, Georgia.

The application period for the Fall 2017 White House Internship Program closes this Friday, June 23. Interested applicants can apply here.

WHAT WE ARE READING

“Trump’s modernization efforts don’t grab as many headlines as his other federal priorities — e.g., repealing Obamacare and reforming the tax code — but they are nevertheless important. These efforts will make government work more efficiently and encourage investment and job creation across the country.”Chrissy Harbin in the Washington Examiner

“One of the last insurers on Iowa’s ObamaCare exchanges announced Monday it would sell plans in 2018 but proposed an average rate increase of 43.5 percent.The Hill

President Mr. Trump has done what President Obama should have done. He made it clear that if Cuba wants normal relations with the United States, human rights violations must end, and so must the harboring of criminals, including Joanne Chesimard, a Black Panther who escaped from prison while serving a life sentence for killing a New Jersey state trooper.” The Washington Times

Source: Will County News

Maybe it’s time to investigate the investigation

Maybe it’s time to investigate the investigation

777 Shares

As the investigation into President Donald Trump’s alleged ties to Russia becomes increasingly confusing, it may be time to take a look at the investigation itself. Something doesn’t quite add up. Here are some things we learned over the weekend.

A report out in The Washington Post last week signaled that FBI special prosecutor Robert Mueller had expanded the investigation into whether Trump or his associates “colluded” with Russia during the 2016 presidential election to include an inquiry into whether the president may also have tried to cover his tracks when he fired former FBI head James Comey.

Trump took to Twitter shortly after the story broke, ridiculing the expanded inquiry as an unnecessary “witch hunt.”

Mainstream press analysis mostly sneered that the president’s response is a sign of nervousness of what may be about to come out of the investigation. The only problem with the MSM summation of the situation is that Trump’s tweets, though riddled with his characteristic Twitter tone, didn’t say anything that the bulk of middle America isn’t already thinking.

One of Trump’s early Friday tweets read: “After 7 months of investigations & committee hearings about my ‘collusion with the Russians,’ nobody has been able to show any proof. Sad!”

Despite the heavy drama and hype surrounding both Comey’s and Attorney General Jeff Sessions’ recent appearances before the Senate to discuss the situation, Trump is completely right. Americans are on the same page today in terms of understanding what, if anything, out of the ordinary happened prior to the election to cause such a national fracas.

We know that we still have no idea what the political circus barkers on the left are talking about when they speak of collusion and meddling. A thorough analysis of the situation provides only this: The nation’s most secretive and bureaucratic law enforcement and  spying agencies– FBI, CIA, NSA– have produced vague reports declaring that the election system of the most powerful nation in the world was undermined by social media sh*t stirrers and some hacked emails that were never very secure in the first place.

We also know that, to Comey’s knowledge, the FBI wasn’t investigating Trump specifically at the time of the former director’s firing. We know that Sessions was in the same building as a Russian official prior to the election and they met. The purpose of the meeting, we don’t know. Everything is a mess of he said and she said.

Some of the things being said are getting attention– they just aren’t telling us anything about Trump or “collusion.”

For instance, we know based on Comey’s testimony that there may well have been some serious obstruction of justice ahead of the election. It’s just that, the obstruction we’re talking about now involves former Attorney General Loretta Lynch coaching Comey on how to talk about the investigation into Clinton’s emails in a way that made a serious breach of the public trust seem only like a “matter.”

We know that Comey’s decision to leak his memos to a friend, who subsequently leaked the documents to friendly press, was likely inappropriate. And if it weren’t problematic enough when he admitted to being a leaker, things got even more confusing when his own former agency refused to release the documents to the public.

Trump and his administration are right in the middle of trial by public. But the public doesn’t have any of the facts in the case– only a series of unnamed sources, shady intelligence reports and pre-mature verdicts trumpeted by the opposition and amplified by a media machine that rolled over for the Washington establishment decades ago.

Here’s another of Trump’s Friday tweets, referring to Rod Rosenstein, the current top man at the Justice Department on Trump’s case: “I am being investigated for firing the FBI Director by the man who told me to fire the FBI Director! Witch Hunt…”

Also on Friday, this ABC report regarding Rosenstein rolled out:

The senior Justice Department official with ultimate authority over the special counsel’s probe of Russia’s alleged meddling in the 2016 election has privately acknowledged to colleagues that he may have to recuse himself from the matter, which he took charge of only after Attorney General Jeff Sessions’ own recusal, sources tell ABC News.

Those private remarks from Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein are significant because they reflect the widening nature of the federal probe, which now includes a preliminary inquiry into whether President Donald Trump attempted to obstruct justice when he allegedly tried to curtail the probe and then fired James Comey as FBI director.

Rosenstein, remember, appointed Mueller to lead the Trump investigation. Now, he appears pretty likely to get the hell out of the way before the dominoes begin to fall.

Why? Well, probably because something stinks.

Mueller, it was reported late Friday, has added at least 13 lawyers to the team investigating president. According to the same report, he plans to add more.

Think about that for a moment.

Ranks of folks at the Justice Department, the FBI, CIA, NSA, and members of Congress– our protectors, leaders, best and brightest– are all looking into the Trump/Russia/collusion situation. No one has found much of anything. Media has already charged, tried and convicted Trump. Hell, half the country thinks the guy is getting weekly payroll checks from the Kremlin. All without the first firm, admissible in court, piece of evidence being shared with the public.

If it’s such an open and shut deal and things are so crystal clear, why does Mueller need an army of lawyers?

This investigation needs to run its course– but not without a secondary investigation into the investigation on its heels.

Source: Will County News

GOP members not voting yes on Health Care bill

GOP House Member State AHCA Stance & DC Number. Call them and ask them to wake up!!!!!!!!!!
Maybe they want single payer like Obama and Hillary
Don Young
Alaska
Undecided
202-225-5765
Andy Biggs
Arizona
No
202-225-2635
Darrell Issa
California
Undecided
202-225-3906
David Valadao
California
Undecided
202-225-4695
Ken Calvert
California
Undecided
202-225-1986
Steve Knight
California
Undecided
202-225-1956
Jeff Denham
California
No
202-225-4540
Mike Coffman
Colorado
Undecided
202-225-7882
Brian Mast
Florida
Undecided
202-225-3026
Carlos Curbelo
Florida
Undecided
202-225-2778
Mario Diaz-Balart
Florida
Undecided
202-225-4211
Neal Dunn
Florida
Undecided
202-225-5235
Daniel Webster
Florida
No
202-225-1002
Ileana Ros-Lehtinen
Florida
No
202-225-3931
Adam Kinzinger
Illinois
Undecided
202-225-3635
Peter Roskam
Illinois
Undecided
202-225-4561
 
 
 
Randy Hultgren
Illinois
Undecided
202-225-2976
Susan W. Brooks
Indiana
Undecided
202-225-2276
Steve King
Iowa
Undecided
202-225-4426
David Young
Iowa
No
202-225-5476
Kevin Yoder
Kansas
Undecided
202-225-2865
Thomas Massie
Kentucky
No
202-225-3465
Bruce Poliquin
Maine
Undecided
202-225-6306
Justin Amash
Michigan
Undecided
202-225-3831
Erik Paulsen
Minnesota
Undecided
202-225-2871
Mark Amodei
Nevada
No
202-225-6155
Rodney Frelinghuysen
New Jersey
Undecided
202-225-5034
Christopher H. Smith
New Jersey
No
202-225-3765
Frank A. LoBiondo
New Jersey
No
202-225-6572
Leonard Lance
New Jersey
No
202-225-5361
Claudia Tenney
New York
Undecided
202-225-3665
Elise Stefanik
New York
Undecided
202-225-4611
John J. Faso
New York
Undecided
202-225-5614
Dan Donovan
New York
No
202-225-3371
John Katko
New York
No
202-225-3701
Walter B. Jones
North Carolina
No
202-225-3415
Michael R. Turner
Ohio
No
202-225-6465
Brian Fitzpatrick
Pennsylvania
No
202-225-4276
Charlie Dent
Pennsylvania
No
202-225-6411
Patrick Meehan
Pennsylvania
No
202-225-2011
Ryan A. Costello
Pennsylvania
No
202-225-4315
Rob Wittman
Virginia
Undecided
202-225-4261
Tom Garrett
Virginia
Undecided
202-225-4711
Barbara Comstock
Virginia
No
202-225-5136
Dave Reichert
Washington
Undecided
202-225-7761
Jaime Herrera Beutler
Washington
No
202-225-3536
David B. McKinley
West Virginia
Undecided
202-225-4172

Source: Will County News