↓ Archives ↓

Archive → April 3rd, 2016

What’s behind the war on Christianity?

What’s behind the war on Christianity?

1.6K Shares

Cross on hill at SunsetThe Christian faith in its true New Testament form is the only religion that cannot be manipulated in favor of One Worldism or universalism, sometimes called the New World Order. This is precisely why the world system and its political leaders hate, despise and persecute Christians and Christianity.

I hasten to explain that all the phony Christian fronts, televangelists and world evangelists are not Christianity but very much a part of the worldly system and an antichrist. They, almost without exception, teach a watered-down, universalist form of Christianity that preaches love and acceptance and tolerance of sinful behavior above all else, especially repentance, baptism and obedience – or dumbed-down Christianity. They want to mold God into man’s image rather than man into God’s.

I hasten to add that no American evangelist did more to promote the dumbed-down universalist form of Christianity than Billy Graham, and no world religious leaders did more to promote universalism than recent and current popes.

All religions are collectivist religions except Christianity which is an individual and individualist faith. Governments want and must have collectivism under some name whether it be democracy, socialism or communism, and the only god acceptable to government and its agents is the god of government.

Collectivism is a certain means of social, economic and religious control. Collectivist politicians regularly espouse individualism, human liberty and democracy at the same time. This is an impossibility. Individualism and human liberty are the opposites of democracy and any other forms of collectivism.

The collectivist mentality or the mass collective mind is the spirit of the New World Order. The collectivist man cannot oppose tyranny because he is himself tyranny. He is the reality of the supreme welfare state in its conspiracy of the ages to manipulate humanity against itself. Collectivism is the foundation of the New World Order. It is supreme and total deception.

The global elite are on a path toward the final and total annihilation of Western civilization. The plan is ancient; to absorb the West into the East with no remnants of racial or religious identity remaining.

The so-called War on Terror is part and parcel of the elite’s plan and is designed as a war on the American people, Western civilization and the Christian faith. The sooner we recognize this terrorist façade as a spiritual war on Christianity and the faithful, the sooner we can begin to throw off the gross deception and see it  for what it is.

Abroad, the U.S. and its proxies are destabilizing regimes and creating breeding grounds for Islamists who are then employed for many purposes, including further destabilization, as controlled opposition and to carry out terror attacks which naturally lead to calls for more government controls to “keep us safe” and to “fight terror.”

The destabilization naturally created a swarm of refugees who sought to flee the violence and destruction being meted out by the U.S., NATO and the Islamists. The European globalists – and to some extent the U.S. – opened its doors to a mass migration of immigrants bringing their anti-Christian religion. In Europe, however, this was merely overkill. For all intents and purposes, true Christianity has long since been eradicated in most of Europe.

The Mohammedans are also the global elite’s tools for ripping Christianity out by its roots. ISIS – created, funded and enabled by the West – is slaughtering Middle Eastern Christians and destroying historically significant Christian buildings, artifacts and symbols. The goal is the destruction of the roots, history and birthplace of the Bible in order to erase Christianity from the face of the Earth, allowing the elites to write a pseudo-religious history in their own interests.

Mohammedans are the perfect tools for the elites’ objectives as the founder of the Islamic cult was a pedophilic camel and jewel thief who hijacked caravans and sacked villages to build his empire. Mohammed was the perfect communist, for he destroyed entire cities, slaughtering everyone including women and children who did not bow to Allah’s Kabah, the magic cube of stone which became the primary icon of Freemasonry’s compass-and-square, the design inspiration for Moscow’s Red Square, and the basis of mind-altering modern art.

Mohammed was also the perfect fascist, as Hitler imitated him, consolidating political power by incorporating the most popular tenets of world religions into his own universalism.

The American system is fascism labeled as democracy. So if we really see the emperor with no clothes, we see the political fronts thusly: Communism = Socialism = Fascism = Democracy. And we see the spiritual fronts as Judaism = Islam = Freemasonry. The deception prevails when we see these as separate and not as the same.

Here at home both the state and local governments are equally engaged in a war on Christianity. It began in earnest in the first half of the 20th Century when the Supreme Court turned the Bill of Rights on its ear and created from whole cloth – and against more than 150 years of historical precedent – that the 1st Amendment erected a “wall of separation” between church and state. Prior to that from the founding of America, the Bible had been  used as a textbook and school books regularly referenced and/or quoted Holy Scripture. In 1781, Congress even approved the purchase of Bibles to be used in schools.

From there we have come to the point that the mention of the Christian God and his Son or referencing the Bible in schools is prohibited and Christian prayer and religious symbols are banned while whole courses are devoted to pushing the Muslim religion on students and they are made to recite Islamic tenets or wear Islamic dress as a form of classroom study.

The First Liberty Institute has documented 1,200 instances of government-on-Christian persecution, according to its Senior Counsel Ken Klukowski. Many of them can be read about here. These range from bans on the wearing of crucifixes in schools to attempts to prohibit children from carrying Bibles to assaults on those who would pray in public meetings to forcing business owners to cater to the sodomites to the Obamacare assault on businesses and institutions (Hobby Lobby, Little Sisters of the Poor, etc.) who oppose abortion and don’t want to provide for it in mandated health insurance plans.

And as in Europe, politicians in the U.S. have opened the doors to a mass migration of anti-Christian immigrants, with special accommodations being made for so-called “refugees” from the regimes the U.S. has helped to destabilize. Note, however, that any Christian refugees from those countries are excluded except in rare instances.

The influx of immigrants brings with them a collectivist mentality along with their anti-Christian values.

The collectivist mentality lures mankind into guidance from “higher authorities” (government). The crowd wants prepackaged truth and human “freedom” as granted by government authority instead of using their own consciousness for making decisions and determining their own actions. Hence, they are easily deceived and manipulated under some altruistic nonsense.

Collective man wants the external authority of government instead of the spirit and mind of Christ. The animal farm is that world arena wherein man collectively surrenders himself, his personal being and his ego to the collective and obedient faith in government authority.

It’s all very simple. A crowd can be manipulated into an altered state of consciousness (Hitler’s torchlight parades) finally evolving into a growing attitude of docility, whereas an individualistic person cannot be so easily manipulated.

The state always considers that a self-sufficient and independent thinker is a threat to collectivism and its efforts to deceive the masses. Since the Christian takes on the being and Spirit of Christ, his total allegiance is or should be to the Living God. He will not sacrifice himself for “the common good” or “higher causes.” He cannot be manipulated by the State.

The welfare state must absolutely keep the people from the individualistic tendency of thinking for themselves.

Government parasites extract their wealth, power and pomp from mass deception based upon altruistic sacrifices of the workers and producers of wealth. Their greatest fear is that this will be revealed.

Human liberty is of God, not a privilege of the state, hence the ongoing war to eradicate Christianity.

Source: Will County News

Government’s surveillance and its stifling of his speech should terrify us.

Now that the government’s made toast of the others, it sticks a fork in the 1st Amendment, too

238 Shares

billofrights0624_imageA filmmaker recently revealed why he shot his movie abroad rather than at home: he fears his government. Can you identify the regime he escaped?

We moved to Germany, because we did not feel comfortable in _____. We felt like we were at risk [in ____]. We didn’t know what [____‘s agents] might do, so we ended up in Munich…”

Was the producer referring to North Korea? China? Russia, perhaps?

Nope. Oliver Stone was speaking about the good ol’ USSA. He “didn’t know what the NSA might do,” given that his upcoming movie, “Snowden,” presents Heroic Ed as “a historical figure of great consequence.” So he moved production overseas. Even there, the feds’ long arm shook its fist at him: “Problems arose with companiesthat had connections to the U.S., he said: ‘… BMW couldn’t even help us in any way in Germany.’”

Funding also posed problems. “’No studio would support [the film,’ Stone] said. ‘It was extremely difficult to finance…’ Eventually, financing came through from France and Germany. … ‘It’s a very strange thing to do (a story about) an American man, and not be able to finance this movie in America. And that’s very disturbing, if you think about its implications on any subject that is not overtly pro-American. They say we have freedom of expression, but thought is financed, and thought is controlled, and the media is controlled. This country is very tight on that, and there’s no criticism allowed at a certain level.’”

Perhaps Stone’s feigning. After all, pretending paranoia over the NSA is brilliant publicity for a picture about the agency’s arch-enemy, Ed Snowden.

But what if he isn’t? How far we’ve fallen, that two-bit politicians and bureaucrats tyrannize powerful producers into seeking asylum!

Regardless of your opinion of Stone and Snowden, a government so hostile to dissidents, to freedom of thought and of expression, should not only shame but very much worry us. If the feds can intimidate a Hollywood honcho as influential as Stone, what chance do the rest of us stand against them?

Nor is Stone the only casualty of this war on the 1st Amendment. “Conservative radio host Glenn Beck is under investigation after a comment he made on his radio show when talking about GOP front-runner Donald Trump…” It seems that Beck and his producer, Stu Burguiere, were joking on-air; the latter mocked Beck’s comment about Trump, to which Beck replied, “‘If I was close enough and I had a knife. Really. I mean the stabbing just wouldn’t stop.” Both men insist that Beck was responding to Burguiere and in no way threatening to stab Trump. But that doesn’t matter to the Secret Service. It “will conduct an appropriate follow-up investigation.”

Seriously? Have these bullies nothing better to do on our taxes? Again, regardless of our opinion of Glenn Beck, the government’s surveillance and its stifling of his speech should terrify us.

And especially so because such censorship is moving from entertainment’s moguls to us: “Attorney General Loretta Lynch acknowledged … that there have been discussions within the Department of Justice about possibly pursuing civil action against so-called climate change deniers.”

Yep, our rulers aim to punish those who reject a discredited myth. Ergo, they are investigating “legal” theories that justify such abhorrent totalitarianism — and there is one, believe it or not, which may be even more tragic than this ham-fisted censorship: “Sen. Sheldon Whitehouse (D-R.I.) … [drew] a comparison between possible civil action against climate change deniers and civil action that the Clinton administration…”

The Clinton administration? This despotism is 25 years old?

“… pursued against the tobacco industry for claiming that the science behind the dangers of tobacco was unsettled.”

Actually, such despotism is far older than a quarter-century: it dates back a full one, to 1919 and the Supreme Court’s wickedness inSchenck v. United States.

When President Woodrow Wilson dragged reluctant Americans into World War I, he had to draft men for his army: sensible citizens refused to die in European trenches. Dissidents published pamphlets against such legalized kidnapping, urging its victims to resist. The government arrested two Socialists for distributing this literature; they protested that the 1st Amendment protected such speech.

Naturally, the judiciary defended the Feds’ warmongering: “…in many places and in ordinary times, the defendants, in saying all that was said in the circular, would have been within their constitutional rights. But the character of every act depends upon the circumstances in which it is done. The most stringent protection of free speech would not protect a man in falsely shouting fire in a theater and causing a panic.”

What a false analogy! Shouting “Fire!” in a theater is an issue of property rights, not of speech; it pertains to the 1st Amendment as much as robbing a gun shop does the 2nd Amendment (and in a free country, the theater’s owner, not rulers, would decide his response to the jerk threatening his business). Yet the modern state bases much of its infringing of the 1st Amendment on this deranged decision. No wonder we endure such travesties as prosecuting trespassers on trumped-up “civil-rights charges.”

Against all evidence, Americans insist that their country is “free.” We cannot build a shed on our property without buying a bureaucrat’s permission; ditto to owning guns and certain drugs. We board planes only after submitting to official sexual assault. We light our homes with the bulbs our rulers prefer, and we fill our cars with gas whose formula the EPA dictates at prices it artificially inflates. If a cop’s so inclined, he can murder us with impunity. Bureaucrats and politicians have invalidated de facto most of the Bill of Rights; they’ve curtailed and encroached on the few freedoms left until our liberties are too weak to do us any good or our rulers any harm.

But because we can still mildly criticize those who lord it over us, Americans cooperate with our masters in calling ourselves free.

–Becky Akers

Source: Will County News

Illinois Lawmakers Seek to Make Falsified Birth Certificates Easier to Obtain

Illinois Lawmakers Seek to Make Falsified Birth Certificates Easier to Obtain
Illinois Lawmakers Seek to Make Falsified Birth Certificates Easier to Obtain

Written By Laurie Higgins   |   03.30.16

Easy Score

State Representative Greg Harris (D-Chicago) and his leftist accomplices, endlessly involved in trying to subvert truth and reality, have introduced the Birth Certificate Sex Designation bill (HB 6073) to make it easier for men and women who wish they were the opposite sex to obtain falsified birth certificates. Harris’ first chief co-sponsor was Kelly Cassidy (D-Chicago), both of whom are at the forefront of every legislative effort that serves the homosexual community of which they are part.

The absurdity and unscientific nature of the content of HB 6073 reveals the absurdity of the law it seeks to amend. This bill proposes to change a reference in the law from “sex change” to “change of sex designation.”

First, this change implicitly acknowledges the true fact that no one’s sex can change. Second, it demonstrates that birth certificates are being rendered meaningless. Birth certificates were intended as legal documents identifying objective birth facts. Gender-dysphoric men who were male at birth remain male. Gender-dysphoric women who were female at birth remain in perpetuity female. Gender-dysphoric men who were “designated” male at birth remain designated at birth male. Gender-dysphoric women who were “designated” female at birth remaindesignated at birth female. No amount or degree of legal or rhetorical chicanery can change what they were designated at birth. When liberals in Springfield figure out how to manipulate time, maybe this bill will make sense. Now it’s merely an exercise in nonsensical legislative legerdemain.

This bill changes the requirements for acquiring a new (and falsified) birth certificate. Currently, gender-dysphoric persons must present an “affidavit” from a “physician” confirming that the gender-dysphoric person has had “an operation” to try to conceal their actual sex. The proposed changes would nix the whole “affidavit” requirement, changing it to a bar far easier to climb over. If this bill passes, all that gender-dysphoric persons will need is a “declaration” from any “licensed medical or mental health professional who has treated or evaluated a person stating that the person has undergone treatment that is clinically appropriate for that individual for the purpose of gender transition, based on contemporary medical standards.”

And what kinds of treatments, inquiring minds might be asking, are included in the “clinically appropriate” toolbox for gender-dysphoric individuals? Will a gender-dysphoric person be required to have had surgery to tamper with their private parts? Nope. Will he (I am using the moribund universal “he”) be required to have received or currently be receiving cross-sex hormone treatments? Nope. Will he be required to be receiving psychological counseling for his gender-dysphoria? Nope. All that will be legally required in order to receive a de facto falsified birth certificate is a “declaration” from a licensed mental health professional who states that this person has received some treatment deemed appropriate by contemporary standards established by the dominant mental health organizations that are drenched in “progressive” socio-political dogma. That’s a bar so low and bendy that even a toddler could scramble over it.

Of course, not even surgical mutilation, hormone-blockers, cross-sex hormones, and cross-dressing can change a person’s sex at birth or in adulthood. And none of these anti-treatments (Treatments imply a disorder, and one’s sex is not a disorder) can change what these persons were designated at birth.

This is what our elected representatives waste their time and our taxes on: making it ever easier for gender-dysphoric persons to pretend they are the opposite sex.

Take ACTION:  Click HERE to contact your state representative to ask him/her to uphold births as accurate legal documents.

Ask them to vote NO to HB 6073.

Source: Will County News