↓ Archives ↓

Archive → October 16th, 2016

Selective and phony moral outrage

Selective and phony moral outrage

845 Shares

Clinton treatment of women vs TrumpSo criminal politicians who regularly vote to steal more money from the people and launder it through government to themselves or their crony benefactors are upset that Donald Trump used foul language and boasted in a conversation he thought private that because he was rich and had star power that women allowed him to grope them.

So criminal politicians, mainstream journalists and entertainers who regularly use foul language are upset that Trump uses foul language.

So criminal politicians and entertainers who use their power, prestige and wealth to engage in sexual immorality and cover for their cohorts who engage in sexual immorality are upset that Donald Trump boasted 11 years ago that he was a philanderer who used his position of power and prestige to have sex with women.

So criminal politicians who vote for or allow policies and military tactics that result in the death of millions of people – including innocent women and children — in Middle Eastern and African nations are upset that Donald Trump used foul language and boasted of groping and kissing women.

So criminal politicians and leftist “do-gooders” who advocate for allowing men who suddenly decide they want to be a woman and use the women’s restroom are upset that Trump may  have barged into the women’s dressing room during a beauty pageant.

So leftist “do-gooders” and Hollywood elites and entertainers who advocate for and actively promote through television, movies, music and literature all types of sexual immorality are upset that Trump boasted on an 11-year-old video tape in a conversation that he thought was private that he ogles and fondles women.

So leftist “do-gooders,” political hacks and mainstream journalists who ignored, minimized or denigrated Bill Clinton’s rape and sexual assault victims suddenly give voice to women who claim only days before an election that Trump sexually assaulted them years ago.

So leftist “do-gooders,” political hacks and mainstream journalists who ignored, minimized or justified Bill Clinton’s numerous sexual assaults on women think Trump should step down  because some women, days before an election, suddenly recall that Trump sexually assaulted them years ago.

So leftist “do-gooders,” criminal politicians, political hacks and mainstream journalists who thought Bill Clinton’s “sex life” should remain private and not be part of the political conversation think Trump’s sex life should be front and center of the political conversation and he should step down because he has had multiple wives and mistresses and uses foul language in boasting that he used his power and prestige to obtain women.

So immoral leftist “do-gooders,” atheists, political hacks and mainstream journalists who regularly belittle, denigrate and dismiss Christians who bemoan the decline of the country’s morality are upset that Trump used foul language and boasted that his power and prestige allows him to find women who will let him grope and kiss them.

So immoral leftist “do-gooders,” political hacks, criminal establishment politicians – most especially Hillary Clinton, Paul Ryan, John McCain, Marco Rubio – and mainstream journalists who advocate for open borders and immigration policies that allow criminal aliens in the country who have been linked to some 70,000 criminal sexual assaults are suddenly upset that Trump, in the last days of an election, is accused by women of assaulting them several years ago.

So sexually immoral Hillary Clinton, who it has been widely reported regularly curses staff, secret service and anyone who happens to be in her path when she gets angry and who spent many  years enabling and covering for her serial rapist husband’s sexual misconduct, is suddenly upset that Trump uses foul language and has boasted that he used his power and prestige to go after women.

Thinking Americans can see straight through this selective and phony moral outrage.

Source: Will County News

Clinton Campaign Official Denounces Catholics as “Severely Backwards,” Calls for Left-Wing Infiltration of Church

Editors Note: Where is the mainstream media on getting this information to the public. Oh I forgot Clinton controls the media!!!!!!!!
Clinton Campaign Official Denounces Catholics as “Severely Backwards,” Calls for Left-Wing Infiltration of Church

 


– Working Towards Creating “an unaware and compliant citizenry” –

Compiled by Catholic Family News

“Conservative Catholics” are the latest Americans to be smeared by members of Democrat presidential candidate Hillary Clinton’s campaign, leaked emails revealed on October 11 show.

Catholic beliefs are bashed as “backwards” and conservative Catholics are termed responsible for “an amazing bastardization of the faith” in one of the more than 1,000 hacked emails from Clinton campaign chairman John Podesta released in mid-October by WikiLeaks.

“I imagine they think it is the most socially acceptable politically conservative religion,” writes Clinton campaign Director of Communications Jennifer Palmieri. “Their rich friends wouldn’t understand if they became evangelicals.”

The exchange between Palmieri, then president of the leftist Center for American Progress (CAP), John Halpin, a senior fellow for CAP, and Podesta, occurred in April 2011 and was entitled “Conservative Catholicism.”

“They can throw around ‘Thomistic’ thought and ‘subsidiarity’ and sound sophisticated because no one knows what the hell they’re talking about,” Halpin wrote Palmieri and Podesta.

Halpin goes on to describe how “many of the most powerful elements of the conservative movement are all Catholic,” and refers to Catholic beliefs as “severely backwards” and asserts that conservative Catholics are utterly ignorant of Christian democracy.

“It’s an amazing bastardization of the faith,” Halpin says in the email. “They must be attracted to the systematic thought and severely backwards gender relations and must be totally unaware of Christian democracy.”

Podesta, Palmieri and Halpen know nothing about what constitutes the Catholic Faith. They view the world and the Church through their warped, left-wing orientation.

Their contempt for Thomistic thought (otherwise known as philosophical realism) and for subsidiarity is no surprise. The Catholic principle of subsidiarity holds that what can be done by the lower should not be done by the higher. What a family can do for itself, the town should not do. What the town can do for itself, the federal government should not do. By contrast, big-government statists such as Hillary Clinton press for increasing control and regulation of business and individual lives.

Along similar lines of contempt for Christianity, we review Hillary Clinton’s speech to the 2015 Women in the World Summit in New York City where she addressed her commitment to “reproductive rights” – code for contraception and abortion. Here she pontificated, “Laws have to be backed up with resources and political will.And deep-seated cultural codes, religious beliefs and structural biases have to be changed.”

Podesta Admits Creating Leftist Infiltration of Church

A subsequent leaked email (from 2012) shows Hillary Clinton’s current campaign chairman John Podesta and a Left-wing activist casually discussing fomenting “revolution” in the Catholic Church.

“There needs to be a Catholic Spring, in which Catholics themselves demand the end of a middle ages dictatorship and the beginning of a little democracy and respect for gender equality in the Catholic Church,” Sandy Newman, president and founder of the progressive nonprofit Voices for Progress, writes to Podesta in an email titled “opening for a Catholic Spring? just musing.”

The emails were leaked in the third round of releases of Podesta’s emails by WikiLeaks.

Newman, who is Jewish, admits he does not know much about the Catholic Church and isn’t volunteering personally to subvert Catholic teachings. “Even if the idea isn’t crazy, I don’t qualify to be involved and I have not thought at all about how one would ‘plant the seeds of the revolution,’ or who would plant them.”

In response, Podesta assures Newman to rest easy for he and his progressive friends have already created organizations explicitly designed to infiltrate the Catholic Church with progressive ideology, though he cautions that the time may not be right for full revolution — just yet.

“There needs to be a Catholic Spring, in which Catholics themselves demand the end of a middle ages dictatorship and the beginning of a little democracy and respect for gender equality in the Catholic Church,” Sandy Newman, president and founder of the progressive nonprofit Voices for Progress, writes to Podesta in an email titled “opening for a Catholic Spring? just musing.”

“We created Catholics in Alliance for the Common Good to organize for a moment like this. But I think it lacks the leadership to do so now. Likewise Catholics United. Like most Spring movements, I think this one will have to be bottom up,” Podesta writes.

In this February 2012 email, Mr. Newman ponders exploiting the US Bishops’ opposition to the Mandate and he asks whether the Catholic Health Association (CHA) might side with “progressives” in their offensive against the Church.

“Is contraceptive coverage an issue around which that could happen,” Newman asks Podesta. “The Bishops will undoubtedly continue the fight. Does the Catholic Hospital Association support of the Administration’s new policy, together with ‘the 98%’ create an opportunity?”

Lifesite’s Lisa Bourne writes, “The CHA infamously opposed the USCCB in its stand against the controversial Mandate forcing religious employers to provide subsidized birth control and sterilization to its employees in violation of their religious principles, with Barack Obama citing the CHA’s support earlier this year to defend the federal government’s case against the Little sisters of the Poor.”

Even Catholic News Agency denounced the leftist “social-justice” oriented Catholics United for the Common Good as being neither Catholic nor for the common good.

Hillary “Hates Everyday Americans”

An April 2015 email from Podesta to Palmieri on campaign rhetoric portraying Clinton as caring about American citizens has Podesta writing “I know she has begun to hate everyday Americans, but I think we should use it once the first time she says I’m running for president because you and everyday Americans need a champion.”

Hillary’s campaign managers are fully aware of her contempt for everyday Americans, but that they should still lie about her as one who “cares about American citizens.”

Clinton Campaign Works Toward “an Unaware and Compliant Citizenry”

Another Clinton campaign email just released as part of the Wikileaks data dump talks about the need to maintain political power by producing “an unaware and compliant citizenry”.

The email was sent to Hillary Clinton’s campaign chairman John Podesta by former Clinton administration official Bill Ivey on March 13, 2016.

Ivey was appointed Chairman of the National Endowment for the Arts during Bill Clinton’s second term. According to his bio, Ivey “is a trustee of the Center for American Progress (a Clinton campaign front), and was a Team Leader in the Barack Obama presidential transition.”

In the email, Ivey outlines the panic amongst some Democrats that Donald Trump’s “celebrity politics” persona cannot be matched by Hillary, who is “not an entertainer, and not a celebrity in the Trump, Kardashian mold.”

“Money isn’t all that important if you can conflate entertainment with the electoral process. Trump masters TV, TV so-called news picks up and repeats and repeats to death this opinionated blowhard and his hairbrained ideas, free-floating discontent attaches to a seeming strongman and we’re off and running,” complains Ivey.

Ivey wonders how Clinton can combat Trump’s larger than life appeal, worrying that simply ‘defaulting to policy’ won’t work.

“And as I’ve mentioned, we’ve all been quite content to demean government, drop civics and in general conspire to produce an unaware and compliant citizenry,” he writes.

“The unawareness remains strong but compliance is obviously fading rapidly. This problem demands some serious, serious thinking – and not just poll driven, demographically-inspired messaging.”

To emphasize, Ivey admits that the left has ‘conspired’ to “produce an unaware and compliant citizenry” but that they’re not as easy to manipulate anymore and that this is a problem. He characterizes “unawareness” amongst the public as a positive thing for the Clinton campaign.

These are just some of the damning emails released by Wikileaks in mid-October. For many of us, it confirms what we had long known from observation of current events.

For rest of article, including actual emails from 2011 and 2012, go to:
http://www.cfnews.org/page88/files/049b994d306030f1676163beeb7d4646-640.html

Source: Will County News

Jake Tapper Says DNC Chair’s Leak To Clinton Campaign Is ‘Very, Very Troubling’

Jake Tapper Says DNC Chair’s Leak To Clinton Campaign Is ‘Very, Very Troubling’
CHUCK ROSS
Reporter
11:01 PM 10/13/2016

CNN anchor Jake Tapper blasted interim Democratic National Committee chair Donna Brazile and TV One host Roland Martin on Thursday for their apparent involvement in leaking a Democratic town hall question to the Clinton campaign in March.

“It’s very, very troubling,” Tapper told WMAL hosts Larry O’Connor and Brian Wilson in an interview.

The leak was revealed in a batch of emails stolen from the Gmail account of Clinton campaign chairman John Podesta and released by Wikileaks on Tuesday.

“Sometimes I get the questions in advance,” Brazile wrote to Clinton campaign communications director Jennifer Palmieri in the March 12 email. http://dailycaller.com/2016/10/11/revealed-donna-brazile-shared-cnn-town-hall-questions-with-clinton-camp/

Source: Will County News

Obama Threatens War Over Anti-Hillary Russian Hacking

Editors note: The hacking is a big problem as is Hillary saying her server with classified Information was not hacked. More important is the content of the emails. Clinton can not be the new Queen of the U.S. like her King counterpart from Chicago Politics Obama.

Read the emails on Wikileaks.com and make your own decision. For me the content is more important than the hack.

Wake Up Republicans!!! Obama Threatens War Over Anti-Hillary Russian Hacking
By DICK MORRIS
Published on DickMorris.com on October 15, 2016

If you thought the mischaracterization of the Benghazi attack was an underhanded way to influence the 2012 election, fasten your seat belt.  Obama has a new one up his sleeve.  He is so desperate to stop Putin from releasing Hillary’s deleted emails that Russia may have hacked that he is literally threatening a cyber-war against Russia if Moscow publishes them.

Wait a minute.

Now we have the spectacle of a president threatening war to keep secret emails sent by his own Secretary of State on an illegal private server. He does so, not in the interest of national security, but to stop Republicans from winning the election.  Not since Henry Kissinger urged South Vietnam to reject Lyndon Johnson’s peace offer so Nixon could win in 1968, has there been so blatant an attempt to manipulate questions of war and peace to influence an election.

In this column, I have warned repeatedly that, reading the tea leaves (not inside sources) I believe that Putin is about to release all of Hillary’s deleted emails through WikiLeaks closer to the election.

This release would be devastating.  It would immediately rebut Hillary’s oft-repeated claim that she did not endanger national security by using her private server for classified emails.  Now, Russia might show up with all of the emails — with no redactions — proving that her server was, indeed, hacked and that our worst enemy got all of them.

Now, as Election Day approaches, the evidence mounts that Putin may, in fact, release the 33,000 deleted emails.  Democrats are blaming Russia for the hacks on former DNC Chairman Debbie Wasserman Schultz and on Hillary campaign Chairman John Podesta.  And, now, NBC News reports that “The Obama administration is contemplating an unprecedented cyber covert action against Russia in retaliation for alleged Russian interference in the American presidential election.  Current and former officials with direct knowledge of the situation say the CIA has been asked to deliver options to the White House for a wide-ranging ‘clandestine’ cyber operation designed to harass and ’embarrass’ the Kremlin leadership.”

Domestically, the Democrats are trying to spread the notion, through their media allies, that Trump and Putin are an item, despite the fact that it was Bill Clinton who got $1.1 million in speaking fees from the Russians to get his wife to approve the sale of our uranium to Moscow.

Their hope is that the issue of hacking and of Russian intervention in the U.S. election will overshadow either the content of the deleted e mails or the fact that they ended up in Russian hands.

Are there any lengths to which Obama won’t go to influence the election?  And this brinksmanship with Russia comes at a time when Hillary is accusing Donald Trump of being trigger happy with nuclear weapons.  Well, Obama has just triggered the most serious confrontation with Russia since the Cuban Missile Crisis in order to win an election.

Source: Will County News