↓ Archives ↓

He who has got used to unreason is ready for unkindness “Dan Proft”

He who has got used to unreason is ready for unkindness


“Illinois Lives Matter”. That is the theme of this year’s Speak Out.

It turns out that is an aspirational statement rather than one that reflects the reality on the ground here.

While the incidence of abortion continues to decline—down another 6% last year and Thank God for that—Illinois still retains its title as the abortion dumping ground of the Midwest.

Chicago has a higher murder per capita rate than New York and Los Angeles combined.

Illinois ranks 47th in the nation in providing services for developmentally disabled persons

The divide is widening between those who believe they are their brother’s keeper and a government that acts only as the keeper of their brother’s money.

Now I am not going to overstate the case as to the State of the State of Illinois because there is no need. The problems we have here exist everywhere because man exists everywhere. There is no utopia on our mortal coil just outside Illinois’ borders.

However, the problems endemic to the human condition are particularly pronounced in Illinois. Someone always serves as the bad example and this is the role Illinois has chosen to play for the United States.

And there is a reason. It is because we have given in to unreason.

As the great Christian apologist (and convert to Catholicism…a little shout out for my faith tradition) G.K. Chesterton observed in a column in the Illustrated London News during the darkness of The Great Depression, “He who has got used to unreason is ready for unkindness.”

When we get used to injustice—particularly institutionalized injustice—we are ready to usher in unkindness, even barbarism.

Do you remember five years ago when the State of Illinois cancelled its 92-year-long adoption contract with Catholic Charities soon after the passing of civil unions? Robyn Zeigler, a spokesman for Attorney General Lisa Madigan, said at the time in explanation of the decision, “Our focus remains on doing what is best for the care and welfare of children in the foster care system in Illinois.”

For 92 years the state said it was renewing the contract because it was in the best interest of children to do so. Then, overnight, Lisa Madigan cancelled the contract because it was doing what was in the best interests of children. The only problem is, Catholic Charities’ policies didn’t change from 24 hours earlier when the state said it was operating in the best interests of children. Likewise, nothing changed about the child’s best interest.

But something changed for the thousands of children in Catholic Charities foster care and the thousands of children Catholic Charities placed in loving adoptive homes. Their interests were sacrificed on the pyre of intolerance masquerading as tolerance.

He who has got used to unreason is ready for unkindness.


Speaking of adoption, you may know because you’ve probably seen them on the roads that 29 states have the “Choose Life” license plates.

These are so-called specialty plates where residents pay a premium for their license plate and a portion of the premium is distributed to organizations consistent with the mission of the plate sponsor. With “Choose Life” plates the benefiting organizations are crisis pregnancy centers and other such adoption service providers. Tens of millions of dollars have been raised through the voluntary purchase of these plates to support CPCs and adoption services providers

Illinois has more than 100 specialty license plates. For example, there’s a plate to support youth golf—for the youth that make it to golfing age in Illinois.

There is no “Choose Life” plate but it hasn’t been for lacking of trying dating back to 2003. The effort has been led by pro-life heroes Jim Finnegan, Joe & Carol Walsh, Jill Stanek, Tom Brejcha, Peter Breen and Tom Morrison—long before they were State Reps.—and many others.

But two leaders for the cause deserve special mention in a story not enough people have heard and not enough people remember: they are Rev. Scott & Janet Willis.

After losing 6 children in a horrific car accident involving another driver who had obtained his CDL license by bribing a Sec. of State’s office employee—the most egregious consequence of the George Ryan-era corruption—Scott & Janet Willis appeared at an African-American church on the south side of Chicago (I was there as well) and said this, “Eight and one-half years ago, Janet and I lost six of our children in a terrible van accident. The tragedy, as the people of Illinois now know, was partially due to a licensing system in Illinois that had been abused for political greed and power. The system of licensing is not bad. The abuse of the system is what has been so destructive. We believe that offering this ‘Choose Life’ specialty plate is one way this system can be cleaned up from its corrupt core and be used for good.”

A State Senator running for US Senator named Barack Obama called the “Choose Life” license plates, “contentious.”

Part of that effort early on included a meeting with House Speaker Mike Madigan, he was House Speaker then just as he is now just as he was when Illinois was incorporated in 1818.

Madigan spoke of his support for adoption because, you know, he told Rev. Scott & Janet Willis (I was at that meeting too), I adopted my daughter Lisa. I suggested to Madigan, that this was great news (though I already knew it) and, despite the suggestion he made that he is but one legislator, we all know him to be a very persuasive legislator and if he wants something voted up on the House floor, then that thing will get voted up on the House floor and we’ll go ahead and hold him to that standard of excellence he has set for himself.

That was the first and last time I was included in a face-to-face meeting with Madigan. Madigan bottled up the “Choose Life” plate legislation in committee and 13 years later the effort continues.

(Remind me to tell you the Emil Jones story).

The short of this is Rev. Scott & Janet Willis brought their grace to the General Assembly in support of a positive development from the incalculable tragedy they endured and at the hands of a government they financed no less. Their views were humored but not considered because voluntary support of adoption service providers through a forum the state has made available to speech (state license plate) was too “contentious.”

You know of the good work CPCs do for children and families alike. Think how many more children and families could have been served by those who live their lives for others with the resources this license plate would’ve unleashed.

He who has got used to unreason is ready for unkindness.


In 2009, when I was running my ill-fated campaign for governor, I got an email from a friend asking if I had seen an executive order issued by ill-equipped Gov. Pat Quinn, also a Catholic (Chesterton, Pat Quinn…we’ve got a big tent…too big), that would allow the public sector unions to try and organize the state-contracted home health care workers.

I had seen something about it but I took to be another public sector union gambit and, at the time, didn’t fully appreciate the implications.

That changed after I met with a group of parents, including a woman named Pam Harris, who had children with developmental disabilities.

They explained how the state’s home health care worker program worked to me in its actual operation. The state provided a rather modest stipend to the home health care worker for a developmentally disabled child for that child’s care. The home health care worker most often turned out to be one or both of the child’s parents because, of course, who has a bigger stake in the care of a child then his parents.

This was the rare state program that was actually in alignment with the interests of Illinois families specifically and civilization generally.

Well, of course, this could not stand. What Quinn’s executive order would’ve allowed is to close the shop of home health care workers and herd parents into the Service Employees Union because SEIU is always looking for to force more dues-paying members into their ranks.

Think about this for a second, the parent would be (forcibly) represented by a union against their child. I’m sorry, Joey, you don’t get fed right now, I’m on one of my two 15-minute breaks.

The courtesy and customer service of the DMV for the developmentally disabled.

He who has gotten use to unreason is ready for unkindness.

Pam Harris and other parents were having none of it. They were not going to let a SEIU business agent come between them and their children. Pam Harris took her case all the way to the Supreme Court of the United States and five years after Quinn’s executive order, Harris was victorious.

I’ve got to give you at least one “and they lived happily ever after” ending.


Unfortunately, the news is generally not so happy as I mentioned at the outset with Illinois’ ignominious record of serving persons with developmental disabilities.

This week Lutheran Social Services announced they are laying off some 750 employees, nearly 43% of their staff, and shutting down a number of programs in the areas of senior services and addiction services because the state owes them $6 million for services already rendered and LSSI can’t afford to float the state any longer.

Catholic Charities is suggesting similar reductions because the state is in arrears to them for $16 million.

There are cries from social service providers to get a budget done, to raise taxes, to make funding social services a priority.

Let me close by informing the fact-free news reports you have likely seen recently on this matter.

$214 billion in debt. $30 billion in assets. 7:1 debt to total assets ratio.

That’s the State of Illinois.

You don’t rack up $214 billion in debt overnight. In fact, Illinois has not passed a constitutionally balanced budget in 14 years.

Illinois has the 5th highest total tax burden in the country according to the Tax Foundation and the worst credit rating in the country according to everyone.

So think through this with me and go help others to do similarly.

My legislative representatives and yours tell me they’re committed to helping the truly vulnerable, those who need temporary help and those who need long-term assistance and services through no fault of their own.

We have $214 billion in debt.

So after all of the taxing and spending and borrowing and spending, if the truly vulnerable was the priority how is it we’re 47th in providing services to the developmentally disabled and tens of millions in arrears to social services providing operating other laudatory programs?

How do you reconcile the contradiction?

They’re lying. That’s how.

Recalling the “Choose Life” license plate matter for comparison and emphasis: Illinois state government doesn’t spend the money it takes from you as they say the will while preventing you a channel to voluntarily spend your money for the benefit of others.

He who has got used to unreason is ready for unkindness.


In close, the good news is that the antidote for unreason and unkindness are the reasoned people in this room who with a servant’s heart those within your circles of influence who are similarly disposed.

I’m not the mindless happy talk guy. So I have to tell you what I think is true, that Illinois has in many ways become a barbaric place to live.

But that need not be our destiny.

What you do matters. Your civic engagement. Your charitable work matters. The opinion leadership you provide within your circles of influence matters.

We need people who know better to share their knowledge, collectively demand better and labor for better.

I find myself going back to read passages from Whitaker Chambers’ “Witness” often to remind myself that the point is to put in the fight for what you think is right even if you think you’re going to lose. You never know. You may be wrong about the outcome.

Thank you.

Source: Will County News

The Illinois Opportunity Project (IOP) announced today that it is making a $500,000 donation to the campaign of State Representative Ken Dunkin, a Chicago Democrat

The Illinois Opportunity Project (IOP) announced today that it is making a $500,000 donation to the campaign of State Representative Ken Dunkin, a Chicago Democrat.

IOP promotes public policy solutions rooted in economic liberty and the leaders who advance such solutions. We are policy-focused and thus post-partisan.

As such, IOP decided that a substantial financial commitment is warranted to support State Rep. Ken Dunkin against the onslaught he is facing from House Speaker Mike Madigan and his public sector union allies in the March primary election.

Rep. Dunkin has consistently shown independent thinking and provided support in policy areas of critical importance including: (1) protecting honest, adversarial collective bargaining between the governor and public sector unions representing state employees, and (2) ending the discrimination against children based on their household income and address when it comes to the primary and secondary schools they may attend. Dunkin’s support for certain structural reforms well predate the election of Gov. Bruce Rauner. For example, in 2010, Dunkin voted for the school choice legislation (SB 2494) sponsored by then State Sen. James Meeks.

Bellside 7

We hope Rep. Dunkin’s example of acting in furtherance of his constituents rather than toeing the party line established by Speaker Madigan will be followed by more of his colleagues in the House.

In Liberty,

Matthew Besler
Illinois Opportunity Project

Source: Will County News

Opposing opinion on our Government coming for our guns

It’s Official. They are Coming for Our Guns…

(by Michael Connelly, Constitutional Attorney) — It is official. 2015 is the year that progressives will make an all-out push to quash the Second Amendment and disarm the American people. I have been reporting on my blog for the last several years about the ground work that has been laid including the escalating efforts to disarm our veterans, the issuing of illegal Executive Orders by Obama to limit gun rights, the movement to get individual states to pass and enforce unconstitutional limits on gun ownership, and the signing of the UN Small Arms treaty.

Now they are ready to make their move and I predict it will consist of a number of assaults on the American people. In fact, some of them are already in the works:

  1. The DOJ is floating the claim that the UN Small Arms Treaty is now the law of the land despite the fact that it has never been submitted to the U.S. Senate for ratification by a two thirds majority as required by the U. S. Constitution. This means that Obama plans to enforce the provisions of the treaty without ratification and despite the fact that in 1957 the Supreme Court ruled that no treaty, even if signed by the President and ratified by the Senate can override the protection of individual rights guaranteed to Americans in the Constitution.
  2. Obama’s enforcement of the UN treaty will include prohibiting the importation of firearms or replacement parts from other countries into the U.S, and providing a list to the UN of all American gun owners, importers, and exporters. In order to legally facilitate this, Congress would have to repeal the ban on funding of a national gun registration. However, I believe Obama plans on doing this by another illegal and unconstitutional Executive Order.
  3.  To continue and escalate the effort to disarm American veterans. The private medical records of veterans are being turned over illegally to the FBI so that they can be put on the NICS list of people who cannot legally purchase firearms because of mental illness. However, mental illness of these veterans is based on minor PTSD, suffering from minor depression, or even letting their spouses pay the family bills. There is no adjudication of mental illness to the point of being a danger to themselves or others as required by law.
  4. Veterans are also being required to tell the VA if they own firearms, how they feel about the federal government and/or the Obama administration and in some cases forced to submit to a strip search to determine if they have any “radical tattoos”. No definition of what constitutes a radical tattoo is provided.
  5. Obama has by an illegal and unconstitutional amendment to the Affordable Care Act overridden the prohibition on doctors to question their patients about gun ownership. Obama has called on pediatricians to question children about whether their parents have a gun in their home. Just recently I have also learned that seniors newly enrolling in Medicare are being required, when they go to a doctor for a routine physical, to take a test to determine if they are showing signs of Alzheimer’s disease. The questions include repeating a sequence of numbers and letters and other memory type questions and then there is the question about whether they own a firearm. Obviously, this information is then sent to the Federal government.
  6. Obama has also issued an Executive order that is being enforced by new HHS regulations that virtually set aside the HIPP law that protects the privacy of medical records. Under these new regulations, if your records contain anything indicating you have ever been depressed, had PTSD or taken certain medications your records will be turned over to the FBI and you will be put on the NICS list. This will apply to everyone, not just veterans.
  7. Obama also has the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, and Firearms changing the definition of mental illness to provide that anyone can be declared mentally ill to the point of being a danger to themselves or others for any reason without an adjudication of any kind, and therefore can be prohibited from owning firearms. This is already happening in states like New York that have adopted similar laws and regulations. A citizen of New York has been declared mentally ill and had his guns seized because he was seeking treatment for insomnia.
  8. In the meantime, we have a Republican Senator casting the deciding vote to confirm Obama’s appointment of a Surgeon General who believes that gun ownership constitutes a health threat. We have the EPA moving to control the manufacture of ammunition because it claims that the use of lead in ammo produces a threat to the environment.
  9. The Department of Justice will continue its campaign to force banks to deny loans and even bank accounts to firearms dealers and will continue to harass them in other ways to force them out of business.

In other words, multiple resources of the Federal Government and some state governments are going to be used to take our firearms, but we can and must fight back. As the Executive Director of the United States Justice Foundation (www.usjf.net) I plan on taking the following actions to:

  1. Contact members of the U.S. Senate and urge them to refile the “Veterans Second Amendment Protection Act” that will stop the efforts of the VA to disarm America’s heroes. This law was previously defeated by Democrats in the Senate.
  2. Continue our representation of individual veterans in their fights to reverse declarations that they are incompetent to handle their own financial affairs and cannot own firearms. We have won some recent victories in this effort.
  3. File suits against the VA, FBI, DHS, and DOD to force them to comply with our Freedom of Information Act requests to gain documents about the attacks on veterans by these agencies.
  4.  Continue our involvement in lawsuits against states that are implementing and enforcing unconstitutional gun control laws.
  5. Offer our support to any members of Congress who file suit against Obama to stop his use of illegal Executive Orders to implement gun control and other unconstitutional actions.
  6. Continue to support the Constitutional Sheriffs and Peace Officers Association (CSPOA) in their efforts to recruit law enforcement leaders around the country to pledge that they will not allow unconstitutional laws or regulations to be enforced in their jurisdictions.


UN Gun Ban: 7 Reasons the UN Small Arms Treaty Won’t Take Away Your Guns

By Brooke Edwards Staggs   |   Monday, 09 Feb 2015 08:26 PM

As the international community for years debated a global treaty to regulate the cross-border arms trade, gun advocates in the United States cried foul over how the U.N. gun ban might impact Second Amendment rights at home.

The furor gained steam in 2013 when the United Nations approved the Arms Trade Treaty and the United States signed on.

Pressure from gun rights activists helped prevent the U.S. from ratifying the treaty. But enough other nations ratified the U.N.’s so-called gun ban that it took effect on Christmas Eve in 2014, triggering a fresh flood of concern that President Barack Obama would try to take away citizens’ guns.

Here are seven reasons why the Arms Trade Treaty (ATT) won’t lead to Americans losing their guns.

1. The treaty only regulates international trade.

Per the treaty, its regulations only apply to the “international trade in conventional arms.” That includes the import, export, or transfer of weapons across an international border.

2. The ATT reaffirms national gun rights.

In its preamble, the treaty reaffirms every nation’s “sovereign right” to “regulate and control conventional arms exclusively within its territory, pursuant to its own legal or constitutional system.”

And it states the U.N. won’t intervene “in matters which are essentially within the domestic jurisdiction of any State.”

3. The treaty supports legitimate gun trade and ownership.

The ATT reaffirms each nation’s rights to acquire weapons for self-defense and peacekeeping efforts. It also recognizes gun ownership “for recreational, cultural, historical, and sporting activities” as allowed by law.

4. The Obama administration affirmed Second Amendment rights.

During a 2013 treaty signing ceremony, Secretary of State John Kerry said, “Make no mistake, we would never think about supporting a treaty that is inconsistent with the rights of Americans, the rights of American citizens, to be able to exercise their guaranteed rights under our constitution.”

Many regulations included in the ATT are standards the United States already abides by. For example, the U.S. already requires records on imports and exports.

And while the treaty encourages nations to share those records, there’s no requirement to turn them over to the U.N. to make an international gun registry.

6. The ATT hasn’t been ratified.

Though the Obama administration signed the U.N. gun ban in 2013, the United States isn’t bound by the treaty’s regulations unless the legislature ratifies it.

The Republican-controlled Senate hasn’t ratified the treaty — and the numbers indicate it likely won’t in the foreseeable future.

7. Obama can’t use executive action to change the Constitution.

While some opponents have expressed concern about Obama using executive action to ratify the treaty, that power doesn’t extend to altering the Second Amendment.

The right to bear arms could be upended only by a constitutional amendment,  which must be ratified by by three-fourths of the states after being proposed by either a two-thirds majority vote in each house house of Congress or a constitutional convention called for by two-thirds of the state legislatures.

Source: Will County News

Sanders Campaign Says It Was Informed By Iowa Dem. Party That Results From 90 Precincts Are Missing

Editors Note: Typical of Chicago democrats to do anything to win. Hillary is from Park Ridge a suburb of Chicago. Chicago voting rule is vote early and often.
Easy Score
Sanders Campaign Says It Was Informed By Iowa Dem. Party That Results From 90 Precincts Are Missing

The Bernie Sanders campaign said early Tuesday morning that it was informed by the Iowa Democratic Party that results from 90 precincts were missing.

CNN reported that the Iowa Democratic Party said it would need to “re-stage” the results of the caucuses in those 90 counties.



The Sanders campaign said the Iowa Democratic Party had asked the campaigns to “help them out.”

With 98 percent of the precincts reporting, Clinton only led Sanders by 0.3 points, 49.8 percent to Sanders’ 49.6 percent.

A spokesperson for the Iowa Democratic Party did not immediately respond to TheBlaze’s request for comment.

Source: Will County News

Obama was never a professor; he was a lecturer

From American Thinker:

Uncle Sam

Lie one:  Obama was never a professor; he was a lecturer.  He did not have the qualifications to be a professor.  Obama never published a single law paper.  He was hired by the University of Chicago when they learned he had been given a book contract on race and law directly after graduating from Harvard.  There was no book – just the contract, which he later reneged on.  This is not the normal level of accomplishment for a University of Chicago professor or even lecturer.

Obama was not capable of writing, and eventually, after failing to deliver, he changed it to a memoir, which he also struggled with.  Finally, he asked Bill Ayers to write his memoir for him, using tapes that Michelle dropped off at the Ayerses’.

Lie two: Obama did not specialize in the Constitution.  Obama cared about and taught only one subject: race.  One course was about race in the Constitution.  It is on this flimsy basis that he attempts to pawn himself off as a constitutional scholar.

As the New York Times explains, Obama the lecturer taught three subjects only: “race, rights and gender.”

Lie three: Obama calls himself a constitutional law prof to imply that he loves the Constitution.  Obama gives the lie to this himself.  He is on record – literally, a radio interview done when he was a lecturer – slamming the Supreme Court’s interpretation of the Constitution because they never tried to invent a right to “redistribute wealth” – a failing he describes as a “tragedy of the civil rights movement.”  Obama laments the constraints on government power (what we would call liberty) imposed by our Constitution.   Obama himself contrasts following the Constitution with being a community organizer, creating “coalitions of power,” which could “redistribute wealth” and create “economic justice.”

It seems the majority of leftists have an issue with telling the truth, desiring to make themselves feel special and more important than they actually are.

Source: Will County News

Caterpillar Inc. announced another series of job cuts

From Illinois Policy Institute 1/292016

Peoria-based Caterpillar Inc. announced another series of painful job cuts on Jan. 29, trimming five facilities and 670 jobs in Illinois and several other states. The company will cut 230 jobs from office and production workers in its East Peoria, Ill., facility, and place another 120 employees from the same campus on indefinite layoff.



The cuts come as part of Caterpillar’s plan, announced in September 2015, to reduce its global workforce by 10,000. About half of those planned cuts were for management and salaried employees, and the other half will come from the consolidation of 20 of Caterpillar’s 103 manufacturing facilities worldwide.

Over the Great Recession era, manufacturing work opportunities have shrunk dramatically around Caterpillar’s Peoria headquarters. According to county-level data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics, Peoria and Tazewell counties saw a combined net reduction of nearly 6,800 manufacturing jobs between January 2008 and June 2015, with the total jobs count dropping to 21,457 from 28,224. That amounts to the elimination of one quarter of all manufacturing jobs in the two-county area.


After a big loss at the outset of the recession, the two-county area regained manufacturing jobs until the middle of 2012. Since then, manufacturing losses have resumed, and, as of June 2015, the most recent month of data, manufacturing jobs in Peoria and Tazewell counties had dropped to within 40 jobs of the counties’ combined all-time low.

Peoria_tazewell_manufacturing-02Prior to Caterpillar’s September 2015 layoff announcement, the company had already reduced its global workforce by 31,000 since 2012.

Included in those earlier cuts was a June 2014 announcement of the closing of three plants in Sterling and Dixon, Ill., which were to be consolidated and moved to similar production facilities in Menominee, Mich. At the time, Caterpillar spokeswoman Rachel Potts said, “[T]he location in Menominee is a better location for efficiency reasons.”

Other Illinois layoffs will result from Caterpillar’s plans, announced in March 2015, to relocate 230 jobs from Joliet to Mexico to “remain cost competitive.”

Caterpillar is facing tremendous global headwinds, as weak growth abroad and plummeting commodities prices have sunk demand for its products in the mining and energy production industries. Moving forward, CEO Doug Oberhelman said, “I’m confident these additional steps will better position Caterpillar to deliver solid results when demand improves.”

Illinois can prepare for renewed global demand by getting its house in order, so that when Caterpillar and companies like it begin hiring again, Illinoisans will get the jobs, rather than workers in other states or countries. Oberhelman addressed this topic in a February 2012 op-ed in the Springfield State Journal-Register in which he wrote:

“In short, when Caterpillar and most other companies look to locate a new factory in the United States, Illinois is not in the running for such projects.”

For Illinois to be in the running for factory development and expansions, Oberhelman said Illinois needs at least two things:

  • A long-term, sustainable budget that relieves pressures on taxpayers, with the 2011 tax hike to sunset as planned
  • Dramatically lower workers’ compensation costs

In closing his 2012 article, Oberhelman called for action, saying:

“Business leaders are making decisions today on where to invest in the future. Illinois must act now, with a bipartisan sense of urgency, to position itself for future job creation that is being discussed in boardrooms all across the country.”

State government failed to enact these needed reforms four years ago, and jobless Illinoisans are suffering for it today. During the last four years, Illinois is the only state in the entire Midwest to lose manufacturing jobs. Enough is enough. It’s time for tax and regulatory reform so that Illinois workers can compete for jobs again.

Source: Will County News

Supporters of Senator Ted Cruz to gather the evening of the Iowa Caucus

For Immediate Release       Contacts:

Steve Orlando (630) 309-3344

        Yvonne Bolton  (815) 272-1110                                                                                            Steve Balich  (815) 557-7196



Illinois Supporters of Senator Ted Cruz to gather the evening of the Iowa Caucus

Enthusiasm for the Texas Senator’s campaign for President heats up in the Land of Lincoln

The media is invited to a gathering of supporters of Ted Cruz’s Presidential campaign as the results of the Iowa Caucus roll in on Monday evening, February 1st, 2016.  The event will take place starting at 7:00pm at the Diplomat West Banquet Hall, located at 681 W. North Avenue in Elmhurst, IL (conveniently located near IL Route 83 and North Avenue).  The Iowa Caucus is the first contest of the Presidential Season.  Voters in Illinois will have their voices heard regarding the presidential race on Tuesday, March 15th.


Diplomat West Banquet Hall 681 W. North Ave. Elmhurst, IL  60126   7:PM until ?

Source: Will County News

Lack of understanding about all things Second Amendment.

Gun Mythology
David A. Lombardo
It’s estimated that there are about 340 million firearms in the U.S., or about 112 per 100 residents. There’s no denying we have a gun culture in the U.S., so you’d think Americans would be pretty savvy when it came to their understanding of the Second Amendment and the ubiquitous gun. Think again.
Whether it’s the fault of intentional anti-gun misinformation or of testosterone-fueled Call of Duty online gaming, John Q has a remarkable lack of understanding about all things Second Amendment.
When I was a cop, the joke with respect to calling 911 in an emergency was, “When seconds count, we’re only minutes away.” Yet John Q is entrenched with the idea that government will protect him and he will reach out and touch someone with a cell phone by calling 911.
Here’s a thought. According to American Police Beat, the average patrol car response time to a 911 call is 10 minutes with speeds exceeding 70 miles per hour. On the other hand-or perhaps more appropriately, “in the other hand”-a Glock 34 responds instantly with a 9mm bullet traveling at about 1,400 feet per second. Whether that bullet is flying toward you or toward the intruder is your call. Enough said.
Another myth perpetuated by the anti-gun cabal says concealed carry will result in blood running in the streets and there will be an increase in crime because of the proliferation of guns on the street. Really, the proliferation of guns on the street? As if the streets of Chicago aren’t awash in illegal guns already?
The fact is there are about 11.1 million concealed carry permit holders in the United States today. According to the Violence Policy Center, a non-profit that makes Michael Bloomberg look like a pro-gun advocate, about 516 people have been killed since May 2007 in non-self-defense incidents involving private citizens legally allowed to carry a concealed handgun. That comes out to be about .00004649 percent of all concealed carry permit owners in the United States. But let’s be honest. Concealed carry laws have a lot less to do with safety and a lot more to do with the state’s treasury. Since Florida passed concealed carry in 1987, they have issued about 2.5 million permits at $120 a pop. You do the math and decide if they’re doing it out of altruism or not.
And finally, we have the uber-left dogma: “More guns don’t mean a safer society.” Aside from the State of California, a sort of reverse Noah’s Ark where every nutball in the country gravitates toward the San Andreas Fault, Chicago has at least the second-most Draconian gun laws in the country yet one of the highest per capita murder rates. Let me put Chicago’s reputation as murder capital of the U.S. in perspective. When I was introduced to Governor Kanda, the Governor of the Achi Prefecture in Japan, who spoke no English, his response to learning I was from Chicago was to point both his index fingers at me and make a machine gun sound.
Okay, so the liberal, anti-gun crowd blames all that on the ability to get guns from outside the city limits. They also argue that Chicago has a “gang problem” and gangs have the ability to obtain guns illegally and use them profusely. Gee, ya think?
But here’s the rub: by Chicago’s own statistics, since Illinois Concealed Carry went into effect, the number of robberies that have led to arrests in Chicago has declined 20 percent. Reports of burglary and motor vehicle theft are down 20 percent and 26 percent, respectively. Those numbers dropped in an inverse relationship to the number of concealed carry permits issued in Illinois.
So here’s the bottom line. John Q is being duped by the liberal progressive anti-gun cabal, and the problem is the great majority of pro-gun folks really don’t know the facts. When confronted with a lying liberal pushing an anti-gun agenda, an occasion that occurs about as frequently as someone from Nigeria telling you that you won the lottery, they don’t know how to respond – the pro-gun guys, not the Nigerian con artists. So the fallback is always, “It’s our Constitutional right!”
Now there’s nothing wrong with that, but it presumes the accusation is correct and that you’re trying to justify it. The point is we are rapidly approaching the most important election in the history of this country. Voting has never been more critical but even more important is to be able to educate your family, friends and anyone who will listen to the truth about the Second Amendment. This election will be the determining factor with respect to the right to keep and bear arms. Instead of playing Call of Duty, how about heeding the call to duty, brush up on your facts and start winning converts.  http://reverbpress.com/politics/firearms-per-capita-by-state/

Source: Will County News

Are You Satisfied or Merely Distracted?

By Stephanie Shirely

25JAN 2016

Life Lesson Are You Satisfied or Merely Distracted

Thanks to technology and society telling us it’s normal and expected to be connected 24/7, we have found more ways than ever to live life distracted. We have become accustomed to consuming multiple forms of media at a time, so much so, that watching TV is often accompanied by surfing our phones for social media updates.

I am just as guilty as the rest of the world. I have caught myself checking my phone with one hand, answering an email with another hand and fooling myself into believe I’m still paying attention to the TV show playing in the background. During these moments in life, I feel productive, entertained and comfortable. But am I mistaking these feelings for happiness?

The question I pose today is this…amidst all of the distractions we use to take our attention off of feeling undesirable emotions like boredom, loneliness, doubt and sadness, are we skirting around the hard, but paramount task of seeking out true satisfaction in our lives?

A few weeks ago, I was listening to a thought-provoking lecture that cautioned us not to mistake satisfaction for distraction. By nature, we as humans have found countless ways to distract ourselves (i.e. procrastination) from the real task at hand, often because it’s more work. But we’re not fooling anyone. The repercussions of our distracted lives can be found all around us. How many “friends” do you have on Facebook versus how many friends you talk to (I mean real, meaningful conversations) on a weekly basis?

The blinking light of a social media update should not be valued higher than your family conversation around the dinner table. The distractions around us are tempting, and sometimes warranted, but for the most part they are futile attempts to fill a void that can only be filled by seeking true satisfaction – whatever that means to you.

The life lesson I want to share is this. We can continue down this slippery slope of distracting ourselves into believing we are satisfied in life, but we will always need to find more and better distractions to make us believe we are “happy.” Or we can start today by taking a closer look at our lives and the relationships that form our happiness. And the first step is to close our laptops during the evenings and weekends, turn off our phones when spending time with loved ones and seek satisfaction before distraction.

It’s a crazy, but simple notion – so simple that unless these two words were brought my attention in stark comparison, I might never have considered how satisfaction could be mistaken for distraction (and vice versa). It really makes me think about my intentions when I’m tempted to pick up my phone at dinner or check my email during family time. If I’m desiring the feeling of distraction, maybe there’s a void I need to fill first and foremost with true satisfaction that is far more lasting.

Take a constructive look at your own happiness. Would you say you are truly satisfied or merely distracted? If you feel compelled to share your insights, I’d love to hear your personal response to this deep question!

Source: Will County News

Clinton emails some to secret to show congress

Tags: Hillary Clinton | US | Clinton | Emails
‘Top Secret’ Info Found in Clinton Emails
Image: ‘Top Secret’ Info Found in Clinton Emails
Saturday, 30 Jan 2016 07:11 AM

Image: 'Top Secret' Info Found in Clinton Emails
The Obama administration has confirmed for the first time that Hillary Clinton’s home server contained closely guarded government secrets, censoring 22 emails that contained material requiring one of the highest levels of classification. The revelation came three days before Clinton competes in the Iowa presidential caucuses.

State Department officials also said the agency’s Diplomatic Security and Intelligence and Research bureaus are investigating if any of the information was classified at the time of transmission, going to the heart of Clinton’s defense of her email practices.

The department published its latest batch of emails from her time as secretary of state Friday evening.

But The Associated Press learned ahead of the release that seven email chains would be withheld in full for containing “top secret” information. The 37 pages include messages a key intelligence official recently said concerned “special access programs” —highly restricted, classified material that could point to confidential sources or clandestine programs like drone strikes.
“The documents are being upgraded at the request of the intelligence community because they contain a category of top secret information,” State Department spokesman John Kirby told the AP, calling the withholding of documents in full “not unusual.” That means they won’t be published online with others being released, even with blacked-out boxes.

Department officials wouldn’t describe the substance of the emails, or say if Clinton sent any herself.

Clinton, the Democratic presidential front-runner, insists she never sent or received information on her personal email account that was classified at the time. No emails released so far were marked classified, but reviewers previously designated more than 1,000 messages at lower classification levels. Friday’s will be the first at top secret level.

Even if Clinton didn’t write or forward the messages, she still would have been required to report any classification slippages she recognized in emails she received. But without classification markings, that may have been difficult, especially if the information was publicly available.

“We firmly oppose the complete blocking of the release of these emails,” Clinton campaign spokesman Brain Fallon said. “Since first providing her emails to the State Department more than one year ago, Hillary Clinton has urged that they be made available to the public. We feel no differently today.”

Fallon accused the “loudest and leakiest participants” in a process of bureaucratic infighting for withholding the exchanges. The documents, he said, originated in the State Department’s unclassified system before they ever reached Clinton, and “in at least one case, the emails appear to involve information from a published news article.”

“This appears to be overclassification run amok,” Fallon said.
Kirby said the State Department was focused, as part of a Freedom of Information Act review of Clinton’s emails, on “whether they need to be classified today.” Past classification questions, he said, “are being, and will be, handled separately by the State Department.” It is the first indication of such a probe.
Department responses for classification infractions could include counseling, warnings or other action, officials said. They wouldn’t say if Clinton or senior aides who’ve since left government could face penalties. The officials weren’t authorized to speak on the matter and demanded anonymity.

Separately, Kirby said the department withheld eight email chains, totaling 18 messages, between President Barack Obama and Clinton. These are remaining confidential “to protect the president’s ability to receive unvarnished advice and counsel,” and will be released eventually like other presidential records.

The emails have been a Clinton campaign issue since 10 months ago, when the AP discovered her exclusive use while in office of a homebrew email server in the basement of her family’s New York home. Doing so wasn’t expressly forbidden. Clinton first called the decision a matter of convenience, then a mistake.

Last March, Clinton and the State Department said no business conducted in the emails included top-secret matters. Both said her account was never hacked or compromised, which security experts assess as unlikely.

Clinton and the State Department also claimed the vast majority of her emails were preserved properly for archiving because she corresponded mainly with government accounts. They’ve backtracked from that claim in recent months.

The special access programs emails surfaced last week, when Charles I. McCullough, lead auditor for U.S. intelligence agencies, told Congress he found some in Clinton’s account.

Kirby confirmed the “denied-in-full emails” are among those McCullough recently cited. He said one was among those McCullough identified last summer as possibly containing top secret information.
The AP reported last August that one focused on a forwarded news article about the CIA’s classified U.S. drone program. Such operations are widely discussed publicly, including by top U.S. officials, and State Department officials debated McCullough’s claim. The other concerned North Korean nuclear weapons programs, according to officials.

At the time, several officials from different agencies suggested the disagreement over the drone emails reflected a tendency to overclassify material, and a lack of consistent classification policies across government.

The FBI also is looking into Clinton’s email setup, but has said nothing about the nature of its probe. Independent experts say it’s unlikely Clinton will be charged with wrongdoing, based on details that have surfaced so far and the lack of indications she intended to break laws.

“What I would hope comes out of all of this is a bit of humility” and Clinton’s acknowledgement that “I made some serious mistakes,” said Bradley Moss, a Washington lawyer specializing in security clearance matters.

Legal questions aside, it’s the potential political costs that probably more concern Clinton. She has struggled in surveys measuring perceived trustworthiness and any investigation, buoyed by evidence of top secret material coursing through her account, could negate a main selling point for her becoming commander in chief: her national security resume.

Read Latest Breaking News from Newsmax.com http://www.newsmax.com/Newsfront/US-Clinton-

Source: Will County News